HENRY COUNTY, VIRGINIA
LARGEST SLAVEHOLDERS FROM 1860 SLAVE CENSUS SCHEDULES
and
SURNAME MATCHES FOR AFRICAN AMERICANS ON 1870 CENSUS
Transcribed by Tom Blake, August 2003
PURPOSE. Published information giving names of slaveholders and numbers of slaves held is almost non-existent. It is possible to locate an ancestor on a U.S. census for 1860 or earlier and not realize that ancestor was also listed as a slaveholder on the slave schedules, because published indexes almost always do not include the slave census. The last U.S. census slave schedules were enumerated by County in 1860 and included 393,975 named persons holding 3,950,546 unnamed slaves, or an average of about ten slaves per holder. The actual number of slaveholders may be slightly lower because some large holders held slaves in more than one County and would have been counted in each County. Excluding slaves, the 1860 U.S. population was 27,167,529, with about 1 in 70 being a slaveholder. It is estimated by this transcriber that in 1860, slaveholders of 200 or more slaves, while constituting less than 1 % of the total number of U.S. slaveholders, or 1 out of 7,000 free persons, held 20-30% of the total number of slaves in the U.S. The process of publication of slaveholder names beginning with the largest holders will enable naming of the holders of the most slaves with the least amount of transcription work. Surname matching of slaveholders with 1870 African Americans is intended merely as suggesting another possibility for further research by those seeking to make connections between slaves and holders.
SOURCES. The 1860 U.S. Census Slave Schedules for Henry County, Virginia (NARA microfilm series M653, Roll 1391) reportedly includes a total of 5,018 slaves. This transcription includes 69 slaveholders who held 20 or more slaves in Henry County, accounting for 2,772 slaves, or about 55% of the County total. The rest of the slaves in the County were held by a total of 353 slaveholders, and those slaveholders have not been included here. Where the enumerator listed slaves held by someone as owner followe by slaves held by the same person as employer, the combined total has been used here. Due to variable film quality, handwriting interpretation questions and inconsistent counting and page numbering methods used by the census enumerators, interested researchers should view the source film personally to verify or modify the information in this transcription for their own purposes. Census data for 1860 was obtained from the Historical United States Census Data Browser, which is a very detailed, searchable and highly recommended database that can found at http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/census/ . Census data on African Americans in the 1870 census was obtained using Heritage Quest’s CD “African-Americans in the 1870 U.S. Federal Census”, available through Heritage Quest at http://www.heritagequest.com/ .
FORMAT. This transcription lists the names of those largest slaveholders in the Henry County, the number of slaves they held in the County and the first page number on which they were listed. No local disttricts were shown on this enumeration. The page numbers used are the numbers rubber stamped in the upper right corner of every other page of the census, with the intervening pages being reported here with a B added to the number of the preceding page. Following the holder list is a separate list of the surnames of the holders with information on numbers of African Americans on the 1870 census who were enumerated with the same surname.
TERMINOLOGY. Though the census schedules speak in terms of “slave owners”, the transcriber has chosen to use the term “slaveholder” rather than “slave owner”, so that questions of justice and legality of claims of ownership need not be addressed in this transcription. Racially related terms such as African American, black, mulatto and colored are used as in the source or at the time of the source, with African American being used otherwise.
PLANTATION NAMES. Plantation names were not shown on the census. Using plantation names to locate ancestors can be difficult because the name of a plantation may have been changed through the years and because the sizeable number of large farms must have resulted in lots of duplication of plantation names. In Virginia in 1860 there were 641 farms of 1,000 acres or more, the largest size category enumerated in the census, and another 2,882 farms of 500-999 acres. Linking names of plantations in this County with the names of the large holders on this list is beyond the scope of this transcription.
FORMER SLAVES. The 1860 U.S. Census was the last U.S. census showing slaves and slaveholders. Slaves were enumerated in 1860 without giving their names, only their sex and age and indication of any handicaps, such as deaf or blind Slaves 100 years of age or older were supposed to be named on the 1860 slave schedule, but there were only 1,570 slaves of such age enumerated, out of a total of 3,950,546 slaves, and the transcriber, though not specifically looking for such named slaves, did not notice any such information while doing this transcription. Freed slaves, if listed in the next census, in 1870, would have been reported with their full name, including surname. Some of these former slaves may have been using the surname of their 1860 slaveholder at the time of the 1870 census and they may have still been living in the same State or County. Before presuming an African American was a slave on the 1860 census, the free census for 1860 should be checked, as almost 11% of African Americans were enumerated as free in 1860, with about half of those living in the southern States. Estimates of the number of former slaves who used the surname of a former owner in 1870, vary widely and from region to region. If an African American ancestor with one of these surnames is found on the 1870 census, then making the link to finding that ancestor as a slave requires advanced research techniques involving all obtainable records of the holder.
MIGRATION OF FORMER SLAVES: According to U.S. Census data, the 1860 Henry County population included 6,773 whites, 314 “free colored” and 5,018 slaves. By the 1870 census, the white population stayed about the same at 6,722, while the “colored” population had increased just under 5% to 5,581. (As a side note, by 1960, 100 years later, the County was listed as having 31,221 whites, about a four and a half times increase, while the 1960 total of 9,110 “Negroes”was less than twice what the colored population had been 100 years before.) In comparing census data for different years, the transcriber was not aware of any relevant changes to County boundaries.
Where did the freed slaves go if they did not stay in the same County? Between 1860 and 1870, the Virginia colored population declined by about 36,000, to approximately 513,000, a 6.5% decrease. Two Virginia Counties that showed a significant increase in colored population between 1860 and 1870 were Henrico, with an increase of over 7,000, and Norfolk, with an increase of over 10,000. States that saw significant increases in colored population during that time, and were therefore possible places of relocation for colored persons from Henry County, included the following: Georgia, up 80,000 (17%); Texas, up 70,000 (38%); Alabama, up 37,000 (8%); Florida, up 29,000 (46%); North Carolina, up 38,000 (8%); Ohio, up 26,000 (70%); Indiana, up 25,000 (127%); and Kansas up from 265 to 17,000 (6,400%).
SLAVEHOLDER LIST:
ASPIRN?, Geo. W., 21 slaves, page 489B
BULLARD?, Wm., 22 slaves, page 495B
DANDRIDGE, Wm. A., 23 slaves, page 495
DAVIS, Mary, 20 slaves, page 474B
DESHAZO?, Geo., 24 slaves, page 489
DILLARD, Geo., 20 slaves, page 485B
DILLARD, Jno. L.?, 24 slaves, page 476
DILLARD, Matilda, 31 slaves, page 476
DILLARD, O. R., 22 slaves, page 487B
DREWRY, Henry, 50 slaves, page 487
FLOOD, Washington, 35 slaves, page 484
FRANCE, H. C., 33 slaves, page 495
GRAVELY (See also Martin, Gravely & Martin)
GRAVELY, Benja. F., 50 slaves, page 504
GRAVELY, Jabez, 30 slaves, page 481
HAIRSTON, Geo. J., 22 slaves, page 503
HAIRSTON, Geo. Pltn?, 23 slaves, page 475B
HAIRSTON, Geo. D.?, 65 slaves, page 502
HAIRSTON, Geo. Sr., 114 slaves, page 504B
HAIRSTON, Henry, 47 slaves, page 478B
HAIRSTON, Peter, 23 slaves, page 500B
HAIRSTON, Peter, 120 slaves, page 477B
HAIRSTON, R. H., 32 slaves, page 487B
HAIRSTON, Ruth, 121 slaves, page 479
HAIRSTON, Saml., 37 slaves, page 501B
HAIRSTON, Saml. H., 130 slaves, page 476B
HAIRSTON, Sarah, 35 slaves, page 502B
HOUSTON, Marshall of Miss., [Edwd. Towns overseer], 101 slaves, page 484B
HUGHES, Thomas J., 23 slaves, page 495
KAY, Sarah, 37 slaves, page 498B
KING, Camillus, 22 slaves, page 499B
KOGER, Jno., 21 slaves, page 491B
MARSHALL [one name only] of Miss., owner, Jose Sluydon overseer, 57 slaves, page 482
MARTIN, GRAVELY & MARTIN, 25 slaves, page 476
MARTIN, Sally, 77 slaves, page 479B
MARTIN, Thomas J., 41 slaves, page 480
MARTIN, William, 36 slaves, page 504
MOLITOR?, Silas Sr., 25 slaves, page 483B
PANNILL, Geo. In trust for minor heirs 5 in number, 27 slaves, page 502
PANNILL, George, 56 slaves, page 492B
PENN, Peter P., 60 slaves, page 497B
PENN, Wm. S., 22 slaves, page 501
PHILPOTT, Charles, 21 slaves, page 486
PRESTON, Wm. B., Jno C. Mitchell overseer, 35 slaves, page 496
PRESTON, Wm. B., Wm. Linkom? Overseer, 75 slaves, page 496
PRESTON, Wm. B., [Thos Mitchell overseer], 55 slaves, page 485
PRICE, Jno. P., 35 slaves, page 502
REAMEY, John, 26 slaves, page 474B
REDD, Jno. O., 54 slaves, page 496B
REDD, Sarah A., [Bo C. Anderson employer], 24 slaves, page 500B
SEALES, Mary, 60 slaves, page 475
SHEFFIELD, Wm. A., 20 slaves, page 501
SMITH, James M., 43 slaves, page 486B
SPENCER, David H., 42 slaves, page 497
STAPLES, Geo., 22 slaves, page 498
STARLING, Edwd. T., 26 slaves, page 503B
STONE, Ludwell, 27 slaves, page 476B
TERRY, Wm. P., 53 slaves, page 475
THOMAS, Nancy, 33 slaves, page 482
TRENT, Wm. B., 30 slaves, page 503
WADE, A. of Richmond, 39 slaves, page 490B
WALKER, Arnold of VA owner, [Saml. O. Smith employer], 28 slaves, page 489B
WALLER, Geo., 21 slaves, page 493B
WALLER, Maria, 23 slaves, page 493
WATKINS, Peter W., 53 slaves, page 499
WATKINS, Tho.? H., 26 slaves, page 491
WILSON, S. P., Oliver P. Shelton overseer, 36 slaves, page 494B
WILSON, S. P. [of] NC, Wm. R. Weam? Overseer, 36 slaves, page 494B
SURNAME MATCHES AMONG AFRICAN AMERICANS ON 1870 CENSUS:
(exact surname spellings only are reported, no spelling variations or soundex)
SURNAME, # in US, in State, in County, born in State, born and living in State, born in State and living in County)
ASPIRN?, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
BULLARD?, 146, 10, 4, 25, 9, 4
DANDRIDGE, 234, 120, 8, 156, 119, 8
DAVIS, 13725, 1281, 6, 2438, 1242, 6
DESHAZO, 9, 5, 5, 5, 4, 4
DILLARD, 568, 186, 48, 228, 179, 43
DREWRY, 37, 15, 0, 21, 15, 0
FLOOD, 244, 76, 11, 97, 75, 11
FRANCE, 69, 13, 12, 20, 13, 12
GRAVELY, 45, 42, 39, 42, 42, 39
HAIRSTON, 608, 380, 253, 456, 361, 244
HOUSTON, 976, 18, 0, 74, 18, 0
HUGHES, 1641, 220, 4, 376, 217, 4
KAY, 82, 8, 0, 12, 8, 0
KING, 4979, 484, 23, 923, 469, 23
KOGER, 28, 13, 4, 15, 13, 4
MARSHALL, 1756, 237, 5, 386, 231, 5
MARTIN, 5318, 436, 62, 820, 429, 60
MOLITOR?, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
PANNILL, 45, 45, 15, 44, 44, 14
PENN, 397, 154, 28, 207, 154, 28
PHILPOTT, 49, 20, 20, 22, 20, 20
PRESTON, 703, 179, 46, 278, 176, 45
PRICE, 2888, 420, 18, 707, 400, 16
REAMEY, 11, 8, 8, 10, 8, 8
REDD, 273, 143, 21, 162, 143, 21
SEALES, 50, 8, 6, 13, 8, 6
SHEFFIELD, 126, 3, 3, 11, 3, 3
SMITH, 29087, 3499, 23, 6339, 3398, 21
SPENCER, 1560, 227, 22, 359, 223, 21
STAPLES, 150, 62, 10, 88, 62, 10
STARLING, 83, 6, 5, 6, 6, 5
STONE, 1070, 102, 6, 168, 100, 6
TERRY, 855, 187, 10, 300, 184, 10
THOMAS, 11418, 937, 14, 1866, 909, 14
TRENT, 219, 143, 7, 183, 143, 7
WADE, 1372, 208, 16, 314, 201, 15
WALKER, 8492, 1161, 9, 2024, 1142, 9
WALLER, 537, 156, 19, 211, 155, 19
WATKINS, 2226, 509, 14, 764, 504, 14
WILSON, 10819, 1146, 22, 2066, 1090, 17
You are the visitor to this page.