AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
Reprinted with the permission of William Oliver, U. S. Geological Survey
and also Jay Ague, editor of the American Journal of Science; April 14, 2000
AMERICAN
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
VOL.
249, OCTOBER, 1951, Pp. 705-728
American
Journal of Science
OCTOBER
1951
MIDDLE
DEVONIAN CORAL BEDS
OF
CENTRAL NEW YORK
WILLIAM
A. OLIVER, JR.
ABSTRACT.
-Two coral biostromes in the Ludlowville formation of central New York are of
special interest because of their great size and almost exclusively coral
thanatocoenoses. The lower bed, designated the Staghorn Point submember of the
Otisco member by Smith (1935), averages some 4 feet in thickness over an area
in excess of 120 square miles, extending from Skaneateles Lake to the east edge
of the Tully Quadrangle, and possibly to New Woodstock. The upper coral bed,
here designated the Joshua submember, attains a thickness of 50 feet but is
smaller areally, extending from Skaneateles Lake to the Tully Valley, with an
area of at least 40 square miles. The faunas of these two beds differ somewhat,
but both are modified derivatives of Onondaga faunas. The beds represent
temporary establishment of conditions favorable for the growth of solitary
rugose corals. The most important condition seems to have been the presence of
a hard platform. Together with other smaller coral beds these biostromes
constitute a small but significant subphase of the calcareous gray shale (
Tropidoleptus)
phase of the Hamilton group.
PREVIOUS WORK
LITTLE
has been published on the Ludlowville coral beds. In the seventy or so years
since the coral beds were first definitely recognized, their areal extent has
been roughly worked out, their stratigraphic position determined, and some
study has been made of their nature and origin, mostly as a result of the work
of Dr. Burnett Smith. The Skaneateles Lake exposure has received the most
attention; Smith (1912) published a paper and a few others have mentioned it as
a notable locality for corals. Other outcrops of the beds have been mentioned
in literature, but little attempt to trace out the beds or interrelate the
known exposures has been made. Most authors have preferred to speculate on
their relationship to other limestone bands. With Cooper's
page
705
________________________________________________________________________
page
706
(1930)
work on the Hamilton group this latter point has been fairly well settled.
Amos
Eaton in the second edition of his
Geological
Textbook
(1832) mentioned "Corniferous limerock" outcropping along Skaneateles Lake.
Although the Corniferous (Onondaga) reference was incorrect it is interesting
as the first mention in literature of the coral beds. In view of this early
knowledge, it is surprising that both Vanuxem (1842) and Hall (1843) in their
reports on the Third and Fourth Districts failed to mention them. However, Hall
(1877) figured several specimens from the "Hamilton group, Skaneateles Lake,"
indicating definite later knowledge of this exposure.
Luther
(1897, p. 282) mentioned this same exposure and two others-Lord's Hill and
"along the hillside west of Otisco Lake." His correlation with the Encrinal
band (Portland Point) was incorrect, however.
Cleland
(1903, p. 85) in mentioning the beds, said:
"Since
in Ontario, Seneca and Cayuga counties the most abundant coral faunas are in
the Basal Hamilton, either this coral reef at Skaneateles Lake is (1) a
continuation of the stratum called the "Basal Hamilton," which is several
hundred feet above the Marcellus shales in the Cayuga Lake section, or (2) the
Encrinal, or (3) the union of (1) and (2) or (4) a separate stratum."
Since
the stratigraphic position of the coral bed is in the Otisco shale member, well
above the "Basal Hamilton" (Centerfield) and below the Encrinal (Portland
Point) horizons, the fourth alternative is the correct one.
Clarke
and Luther (1905, p. 47) mentioned the Fellows Falls exposure.
The
most important study of the coral beds yet made was by Burnett Smith (1912). In
his introduction he said:
"Locally,
however, we find in the shales layers which are composed of corals to the
practical exclusion of other forms of life. Such layers are, in the main, of
small thickness, and in studying them' we are confronted with the usual limited
horizontal exposure. The coral reefs (if they can be dignified with the term)
which form the basis for this description are an
Fig.
1. Small terraces formed by the Centerfield member (C) and the platform (p).
Ravines on left and right are localities 25 and 24 respectively.
Fig.
2. Portion of aerial photograph including area shown above. Terraces formed by
the Centerfield (C), platform (p) and Portland Point (PP) layers are indicated.
(A.A.A. Photo)
page
707 Coral Beds of Central New York
exception
in this last respect, for they present a large and very beautiful exposure of
about a mile along the eastern shore of Skaneateles Lake in Onondaga County,
New York." (Smith, 1912, p. 446).
He
divided this exposure into three parts: 1) The Large Southern Reef, 2) The
Channel, and 3) The Small Northern Reef. Although these terms are useful in
discussing this one exposure, they are not a strictly accurate statement of the
situation. The two "reefs" may better be thought of as two western tongues of
the main coral bed, the "channel" being an invagination in the western side of
the bed. Smith made mention of the exposures on the west side of Otisco Lake,
the Vesper (Fellows Falls) "reef" and the Joshua (Lord's Hill) exposures, and
considered them to be essentially equivalent to the Staghorn Point bed. The
origin of the bed was attributed by Smith (1912, p. 453) to a local clearing
and shoaling of the Hamilton seas with consequent flourishing coral growth:
"Though
these changes, physical and faunal, were of short duration when compared with
the whole of Hamilton time, they nevertheless represent perhaps the' most
striking episode in the history of the Hamilton Sea in this area, namely, a
transitory return to Onondaga-like conditions,, followed again by the
mud-bearing waters and the mud-loving fauna of the typical Hamilton."
Cooper
(1930, p. 228) described the Staghorn Point coral bed exposure as varying in
thickness from one to 5 feet and extending nearly two-thirds of a mile north of
where first seen, being separated by a "channel" from a small northern "reef " :
"The
beds are composed mostly of cup corals,
Zaphrentis,
Heliophyllum,
and
Cystiphyllum,
packed tightly together in a matrix of dark, sandy shale."
The
Fellows Falls and Conklin's Falls exposures were mentioned.
“East
of Conklin’s Falls a thin bed of corals occurs above the falls in the
east branch of Limestone Creek at New Woodstock, Cazenovia Quadrangle. This
has the same kind of corals and holds a stratigraphic position identical with
that of the Vesper Reef.” (p. 228).
Fig.
1. Surface of glacially smoothed and striated bed north of Jenney Point,
Skaneateles Lake, showing natural, polished section of Siphonophrentis.
Specimen is 4 1/2 inches long. (Loc. 2k)
Fig.
2. Roadside exposure of Joshua submember at Lord's Hill, showing the
concentration of corals which is typical of both coral beds.
page
708
William A . Oliver, Jr.-Middle Devonian
An
"upper reef," 65 feet thick, was mentioned as being exposed at Lord's Hill near
Joshua. Luther's correlation of the beds with the "Encrinal band of the western
counties" was held untenable as they are "stratigraphically below the Tichenor
and Portland Point horizons, and above the Centerfield horizon."
Smith
(1935, p. 46) described again the Skaneateles Quadrangle exposures of the coral
beds. He included them in his Otisco member which is "the shale which lies upon
the Centerfield and extends upwards for about 150 feet." (p. 45).
"About
fifty feet above the Centerfield occurs the lower coral bed with the hard and
coarsely bedded platform on which it rests. The latter is transitional from
softer shale below and ranges between five and ten feet in thickness. its
capping coral bed or 'reef' is commonly about three or three and one-half feet
thick but may thin down to almost nothing."
The
Staghorn Point exposure was mentioned, and the name Staghorn Point submember
proposed for the "coral bed or reef typically shown just south of Staghorn
Point." Exposures along Otisco Lake valley were mentioned and it was suggested
"that a reef margin trending a few degrees east of north is indicated for the
Staghorn Point submember in the belt between Skaneateles Lake and the eastern
wall of the Otisco Lake valley." Exposures at Otisco Valley hamlet and Fellows
Falls in the Tully Quadrangle were mentioned. The upper coral bed was described
as being 90 feet above the Centerfield, with a maximum thickness of "somewhat
over 30 feet," on the west side of Otisco Lake. The exposure of this bed in
Tenmile Point ravine was mentioned, but no details were given. No discussion of
the origin of the beds was included, reference being made to the author's
earlier work (Smith, 1912).
Wells
(1937) discussed in detail the "Individual variations in
Heliophyllum
halli
Edwards and Haime found in the coral beds." He summarized the previous work
done on the coral beds by enumerating the described localities, giving
thicknesses and stratigraphic position where indicated by the earlier workers.
A list of the coral species identified by him
was
included. A summary of Smith's interpretation of the beds (Smith, 1912, p. 453)
was made and expanded upon:
"Most
of the corals listed. above were related to, if not identical with, those of
the Onondaga limestone of lower middle Devonian
page
709 Coral Beds of Central New York
age
which had scattered at the close of that epoch in New York. Returning once
more in the early Ludlowville, they remained more or less abundant until the
end of Tully time." (Wells, 1937, p. 6).
Cooper
and Warthin (1942, p. 887) mentioned the lower coral bed in connection with
their discussion of the Centerfield limestone fauna. They suggested that from
the faunal point of view the lower coral bed "may belong to the Centerfield,"
pointing out that the Centerfield fauna continues up through the lower shales
of the Otisco member.
There
are a few other references to the Ludlowville coral beds, but they consist
merely of brief mention of the beds as fossil collecting localities. They are
indicated in the reference list by an asterisk (*).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The
writer wishes to express appreciation to Professor J. W. Wells of Cornell
University for guidance and assistance in this work. Professor C. M. Nevin
criticized the manuscript and gave several suggestions regarding the diagrams.
Thanks are due Mrs. Mary H. Ross whose recent study of the tabulate corals of
the New York Hamilton beds was important in paleoecological interpretation.
Field
work in the summer of 1949 was aided by a grant from the New York State Science
Service, for which grateful acknowledgment is here made. The work was done at
Cornell University as partial fulfillment of requirements for the M.A. degree,
June 1950.
SETTING
OF THE CORAL BEDS
The general stratigraphic setting of the area under discussion is indicated in
figure 1. The Otisco member of the Ludlowville formation includes the two main
coral beds. This member is composed of very fossiliferous thin-bedded, gray
shale, bounded below by the resistant, more massive argillaceous limestone of
the Centerfield member and above by the harder and thicker-bedded shales of the
Ivy Point member.
The
positions of the beds vary somewhat (fig. 3) but in general they are about 50
and 95 feet respectively above the top of the Centerfield. Because of their
position above the Centerfield limestone and well below the Portland Point
horizon (fig. 1), the suggested correlations of Luther (1897,
page
711 Coral Beds of Central New York
p.
282) and Cleland (1903, p. 85) with the "Basal Hamilton" (Centerfield) or with
the "Encrinal" (Portland Point) are not possible. No limestone bands are known
from the Otisco shale or its equivalents either east or west of the area
described in this paper, and the coral beds thus form distinct units within the
Otisco.
The
coral beds themselves consist of a mass of ' f rugose coral skeletons so
numerous and closely packed that only the interstices are filled with a matrix
of the same shaly sediment which constitutes the body of the Otisco member'
(plate 2, fig. 2). Individual corals vary in length from one to as much as 24
inches. Most of the corals appear to have been turned over and rolled, but some
are seen in their positions of growth. Colonial rugose corals are uncommon,
except locally as noted below, but together with the equally scarce, tabulates
are found in their living positions. The faunas of the two beds differ in
detail- (table 1), but both are characterized by a great profusion of rugose
corals and a relative scarcity of tabulate corals. Notable is the almost
complete absence of other groups such as bryozoa, brachiopods, molluscs,
crinoidal fragments and trilobites which are abundant in the Otisco shale proper.
The
lateral relationships of the two beds are similar (figs. 3, 4 and 6). The
greatest thickness of each bed is found centrally while-toward the edges a
gradual thinning is noted. At the extreme edge the beds interfinger with the
surrounding shale. Occasional shale lenses or tongues are found more centrally
located, indicating periods when the corals were locally overwhelmed by the muds.
The
upper and lower contacts of the beds are sharply defined except in the fringing
areas where there may be a complete gradation up into the normal shales. Of
interest is the presence of a basal platform which forms the substrate on which
the first corals grew. Later corals grew on the skeletons of their
predecessors. The platforms were of the utmost importance in determining the
areal distribution of the coral beds, only the thin, interfingering, lateral
stringers of corals extending beyond their limits.
Over
most of the area covered by the coral beds, the structure is relatively simple,
the main feature being the gentle regional dip which averages about 50 feet per
mile in a direc-
713
Coral Beds of Central New York
tion
slightly west of south. This inclination causes the lower bed to dip out of
sight to the south while both beds rise above the present erosion surface to
the north, leaving little information on the original extent of the beds in
those directions. Marked thinning of the lower bed toward the south, however,
suggests the proximity of the edge of the bed in that direction (fig. 3).
One
fault zone is worthy of mention because of its effect on the outcrop at Lord's
Hill. It can be traced for a distance of 2 miles and has a maximum observable
displacement of 46 feet. The fault plane strikes N 57' W and is almost
vertical. The situation in the ravine at Lord's Hill (Loc. 41) is shown in
figure 5. One-half mile southeast in another ravine (Loc. 40) the displacement
is again observed. Here however the fault (or fault zone) passes between the
lower bed and the Centerfield horizon, causing the vertical interval between
the two to be some 40 feet greater than usual. In a third ravine at Case Hill
(Loc. 39) in line with the other two localities, a 5-foot displacement is seen
within the upper bed. This f ault can not be traced west of the first ravine
noted because of the jointed nature of the shales, but it certainly extends as
far as the road exposure at Lord's Hill (Loc. 42) where it probably is
responsible for the excessive thickness of the upper bed at that locality.
THE
LOWER CORAL BED
(STAGHORN
POINT SUBMEMBER)
The
lower coral bed, designated the Staghorn Point submember by Smith (1935, p. 46)
from the exposures north and south of Staghorn Point on the east side of
Skaneateles Lake, is in the Otisco shale about 50 feet above the top of the
Centerfield limestone (fig. 1). The position of the bed with the Centerfield
as datum varies regularly, being slightly higher to the north and west than it
is to the south and east.
The
Staghorn Point bed can be traced in an east-west direction for a distance in
excess of 15 miles, from Skaneateles Lake to the east edge of the Tully
Quadrangle (fig. 2). On the west side of Skaneateles Lake (Loc. 1), at the
proper horizon is found a very thin zone of the same corals which characterize
the Staghorn Point exposure on the opposite side of the lake. This zone
probably represents the western
714
William A. Oliver, Jr.-Middle Devonian
or
northwestern feather edge of the bed. The northwestern extremities of the bed
are seen along the east side of Skaneateles and along Otisco Lake. Farther east
the northern limits of the bed are indeterminable for reasons cited above. The
southern limits are likewise unknown except in the Otisco Valley where the
southernmost exposures (Loc. 7) show a marked thinning of the bed in that
direction (fig. 6.).
The
eastward extent is not precisely determinable, since good sections are
infrequent east of Butternut Creek Valley. The more easterly exposures are of
limited value, indicating only the presence of the bed. Cooper (1930, p. 223)
mentions a “thin bed of corals ... above the falls in the east branch of
Limestone Creek at New Woodstock, Cazenovia Quadrangle," having "the same kinds
of corals and. . . a stratigraphic position identical” with that of the
lower bed. Unfortunately, since Cooper did his work, a dam has been built at
this site so that it is no longer possible to see the coral bed. Further, no
other bedrock exposures at the proper horizon have been found in that area and
structure projections from the known position of the bed would place it some 50
feet higher than Cooper's horizon, perhaps indicating that his bed is
Centerfield in age. But assuming Cooper's identification to be correct, the
coral bed is thus extended an additional 7 miles eastward. Exposures of the
Otisco shale near Erieville, 5 miles farther east, indicate that the coral bed
does not extend that far.
The
thickness of the lower bed ranges from a few inches in the fringing areas to
almost 12 feet at Conklin's Falls. There is no regular pattern of variation
except at the extremities where it thins down to feather edges. The variation
in thickness of the lower bed is indicated in figures 3, 4 and 6.
The
commonest genera found in the Staghorn Point submember are Siphonophrentis,
Cystiphylloides, Heliophyllum, Heterophrentis, Bethanyphyllum and Eridophyllum,
in that order. Stereoelasma, common in the surrounding shales, is found only in
the shaly or interfingering edges of the coral bed. Favosites is rather
widespread, but specimens are comparatively scarce. A single stromatoporoid has
been found. Tables I and 2 show the relative abundances of the rugose corals
identified by the writer and their lateral distribution. In addition the
following tabulates have been identified by Mrs. Mary Ross:
715
Coral Beds of Central New York
Aulopora
elleri
Fenton
Aulopora
sp.
Ceratopora;
jacksoni
Grabau
Favosites
arbuscula n. subsp.
F.
emmonsi
Rominger
F.
two new species
F.
turbinata
Billings
All
of these are flat and expanded or branching in form.
Table
2
Lateral
Distribution of the Rugose Species in the Staghorn Point Submember.
|
feather
|
Shaly
|
Edge
of
|
Main
|
|
edge
|
edge
|
main
body
|
body
|
Stereoelasma
rectum
Hall
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
Cystiphylloides
varians
Hall
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
Cystiphylloides
conifollis
Hall
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Siphonophrentis
halli
E. and H.
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Heliophyllum
halli
E. and H.
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Amplexiphyllum
hamittoniae
Hall
|
|
X
|
|
|
Bethanyphyllum
robustum
Hall
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
Heterophrentis
simplex
Hall
|
|
|
X
|
|
Eridophyllum,
subcaespitosum
Nicholson
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
Heterophrentis
ampla
Hall
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
Cystiphylloides
americanum
E. and H.
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
Cystiphylloides
corrugatum
Hall
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
Heliophyllum
confluens
Hall
|
|
|
|
X
|
Over
most of its area the lower coral bed rests on a hard platform of ripple-marked
silty sandstone, which grades downward within 5 or 10 feet to the shale of the
Otisco member. This platform produces a small waterfall in almost every ravine
which cuts across it. In addition it forms a small but prominent escarpment
along the valley sides, at places being visible from a distance of one or 2
miles (plate 1). The coral bed is much less resistant to weathering and erosion
than the platform, and is only exposed where ravines or gullies cut deeply
across the platform. In some localities, even in steep ravines, the coral bed
may be completely covered, its presence being indicated only by a concentration
of corals and pieces of coral bed, on and just below the platform.
The
lateral relationship between the coral bed and the shale
716
William.
A. Oliver, Jr.-Middle Devonian
is
exceptionally well known in the cliffs along the east side of Skaneateles Lake
where the Staghorn Point bed is exposed with very few interruptions for a mile
and a half. This section is shown in detail in figure 4. The northern part of
this exposure shows the interfingering and shaly character of the edge of the
bed. Just north of Jenney Point (Loc. 2k), what is apparently the lowermost of
the fanning beds shows glacial striae on its upper surface and is overlain by
glacial till, indicating that part of the fanning zone has been removed (plate
2, fig. 1).
THE
UPPER CORAL BED
(JOSHUA
SUBMEMBER)
The upper coral bed is here designated the Joshua submember of the Otisco shale
from the exposures at Lord's Hill near Joshua. (Locs. 40 and 41). The interval
between the coral bed and the Centerfield limestone varies regularly from 90
feet in the southern area to 100 feet in the more northern type area.
Smith
(1935, p. 47) recognized the upper coral bed as a unit separate from the lower
bed. In his earlier work (191.2, p. 452) he had recognized that the Joshua
exposure was at a much greater elevation, but thought that the regional dip was
responsible and that the two beds could be stratigraphic equivalents.
The
upper coral bed has a northeast-southwest extent of nearly 9 miles from the
east side of Skaneateles Lake to Case Hill in the Tully Valley. The areal
extent of this bed (fig. 2) is better known than that of the lower coral bed.
Only in the area north and northwest of Lord's Hill where the coral bed horizon
has risen above the present ground surface are the limits uncertain. Although
the area covered by the upper bed is small compared to that of the lower bed,
the thickness is much greater, as indicated by figure 3. The excessive
thickness of 65 feet, however, mentioned in literature for the Lord's Hill road
cut exposure (Loc. 42) is probably due to faulting as previously noted. The
actual maximum of about 50 feet is found on the east side of Otisco Lake and in
the type section. Laterally the bed thins and is marked at its edges by thin
fingers extending into the shale (fig. 6).
The
rugose genera found in the Joshua submember are
717
Coral Beds of Central New York
the
same as those found in the lower bed, but they differ in-abundance. The most
common genera are
Cystiphylloides,
Siphonophrentis,
Bethanyphyllum,
Heliophyllum
and
Heterophrentis,
in that order.
Heliophyllum
is not as common as in the lower bed and
Bethanyphyllum
and
Cystiphylloides
are more so. The colonial rugose form
Eridophyllum
is found irregularly distributed throughout the main part of the coral bed as
in the lower one, and in addition forms a basal zone from 6 to 12 inches thick
over most of the area covered by the bed. Table I shows the relative abundance
of the rugose species in the bed. Mrs. Mary Ross has identified the following
tabulates:
Favosites
placenta
n. subsp.
F.
alpensis
n. subsp.
F.
wartheni
n. subsp.
These
are thick massive forms, some with knobby surfaces. None are delicate,
branching forms.
The
base of the upper coral bed lies in sharp contact on the shale of the Otisco
member, with no sandstone platform. But at almost every exposure of the bed
where the lower contact can. be seen, there is the basal
Eridophyllulm
zone. These colonial rugose corals probably colonized the area during an
interval of favorable conditions and formed a crude platform on which the
solitary corals grew.
OTHER
HAMILTON CORAL BEDS
Although
the two coral beds described in this paper are unusual because of their
thickness, extent and almost exclusively coral composition, they are not
unique, and many smaller coral beds have been reported from the Hamilton of New
York; and adjacent areas of Pennsylvania and Ontario. Two of these occurrences
have been visited and another coral bed was found during the course of the
present work. These and a few others will be discussed briefly to enlarge the
general picture of the occurrences of coral beds and the environmental factors
favorable for their development.
Meristella-Coral
Zone
.
-- This coral bed located in the basal part of the Otsego member of the
Marcellus formation in eastern New York was named by Cooper (1934, p. 549) who
mentioned two localities where the zone could be recognized. At one of the
localities-Stony Creek, one mile South
719
Coral Beds of Central New York
east
of Middleburg, Schoharie Quadrangle corals are rare. At the other locality-one
and one-half miles southwest of East Berne, Berne Quadrangle-corals are
abundant. Goldring (1935, p. 190) describes the bed in the latter locality as
"a three foot coral bed, the lower two feet of which are calcareous and the
upper one foot the main coral zone. ‘Zaphrentis’, Cystiphyllum,
several tabulate corals and representatives of other groups, brachiopods
especially, form the principal faunal elements. “Very little can be
added to this description. The lower 2 f eet of the zone is the upper part of a
very hard, sandy layer, in which collecting is extremely difficult. The upper
foot is shaly and corals, principally Siphonophrentis and Cystiphylloides, are
easily extracted.
This
bed differs from the Ludlowville beds in many ways. The corals seem to be
concentrated in the middle part of the bed, becoming more sparse as the upper
and lower limits of the bed are approached. As mentioned above, other animal
groups, especially the brachiopods, are important constituents of the
transition zones, although the middle part of the bed seems to be almost
exclusively formed by corals. The areal extent of the zone-is not known,
although the fact that Cooper's two localities are some 15 miles apart
indicates that it may not be inconsiderable. The Stony Creek occurrence,
however, can hardly be called a coral "bed," and the extent of the true coral
bed may not be very great.
Delphi
Coral Bed, Skaneateles Formation. - A thin bed of zaphrentid corals was found
in the upper part of the Delphi member of the Skaneateles formation,
approximately threequarters of a mile southwest of Delphi, Cazenovia Quadrangle
,(Loc. 69). The bed, which is only 6 inches thick, is in the midst of the
"coarse sandy shales and sandstones abounding in pelecypods, which form the
bulk of the fauna," described by Cooper (1930, p. 220) from the Delphi Falls
section. It is tightly packed with individuals of Siphonophrentis and
Heterophrentis, cemented by the gray sandy shale which forms strata above and
below the coral bed. The top and bottom contacts are very sharp, only a slight
faunal mixing being seen in the sandy shales above the bed. This coral bed was
not f ound at Delphi Falls, a mile east, and the lateral relationships and
extent of the bed are not known.
721
Coral Beds of Central New York
The
Delphi coral bed is much like the Ludlowville beds except for its small size
and lack of a platform. The absence of fossils other than the rugose corals and
the sharp contacts with the shale show that sedimentary and environmental
conditions were similar to those of the larger beds.
Centerfield
Coral Zone
,
Pennsylvania.-The coral bed at the base of the Ludlowville formation in eastern
Pennsylvania was designated the Centerfield coral zone by Willard (1939, p.
178). According to him (1936, p. 32) the bed extends for 150 miles along the
Hamilton outcrop belt in eastern Pennsylvania, having a thickness of 20 feet in
the east, but thinning westward to about 3 feet in the Susquehanna Valley. The
best exposure of the bed is in a road cut 3 miles north of Stroudsburg,
Pennsylvania, where the thickness is about 13 feet.
The
bed is quite different f rom the Ludlowville coral beds previously discussed.
The fauna is not composed almost exclusively of rugose corals. Bryozoa,
brachipods, pelecypods, trilobites, crinoid remains and tabulate corals are
important constituents. In addition the rugose species and genera are somewhat
different. The upper and lower limits of the bed are not sharply defined, a 2
or 3-foot transition zone being seen at the top and bottom. Willard correlated
this zone with the Centerfield limestone of New York because of its fauna and
apparent stratigraphic position. The New York Centerfield is noted for the
coral elements of its fauna, but only locally is it reported to approach a
coral bed in composition and structure. Apparently conditions for coral growth
were somewhat less than optimum over most of the Centerfield sea. Locally in
the Stroudsburg area, however, conditions were adequate for the development of
a dominantly coral biocoenose.
Coral
Beds, Ludlowville and Moscow of Western, New York
.
-- In the Hamilton group of western New York and Ontario there are many thin,
localized, and more or less well defined coral beds. Most of these beds are
found at or near the Centerfield or Tichenor (Encrinal) horizons, indicating
patchy, temporary conditions favorable to coral growth and expansion.
Payne
(1938, p. 53) points out the numerous corals to be found in the Centerfield
member in Jaycox Run, 6 miles south
723
Coral Beds of Central New York
of
Avon, Livingston county. He says: “The sea bottom of Centerfield time
like that of Onondaga time, must have been particularly ideal for the existence
of corals, especially the individual cup corals, many types of which may be
found.” Farther to the west in the same county, "In the stream bed of a
ravine just east of Rork a low. dome-shaped reef structure packed with corals
may be seen in the Centerfield." (
ibid.).
But according to J. W. Wells. (personal communication), “It is hardly
dome-shaped, rather lenticular, up to two feet thick, thinning east and west;
there is a; notable lack of
Siphonophrentis,
and other genera are represented by small individuals.”
The
Tichenor member in the. York area is likewise described as virtually a coral
bed. Hall (1843, p. 189) mentions a locality a mile west of York where the
shale immediately below the Encrinal (Tichenor) limestone “is completely
charged with, Cyathophylli of different species,
Favosites
and other corals with some trilobites and shells.” Further he states (p.
195) "some of the more abundant corals are identical" with these of the Onondaga.
Schuchert
and Dunbar (1941, p. 204) refer to "local recurrences of coral reefs (as at
East Bethany), made by species descended with little change from the Onondaga
types that had persisted locally beyond the range of the early Hamilton black
muds and now reestablished themselves where the waters were not too muddy." The
occurrences west of East Bethany, Genesee County, are further discussed by
Slocum (1906, p. 258) who mentions local coral concentrations in the shales
just below the Encrinal [actually Centerfield, not Encrinal (Tichenor)].
Brachiopods and other fossils are commonly associated with the corals.
Grabau
(1898, p. 29) discusses a "coral layer ... eighteen or twenty inches above the
Encrinal limestone." The layer is found in the Eighteen Mile Creek section and
along Lake Erie, south of the creek mouth.
"It
is about three inches thick, and in most places consists entirely of an
accumulation of cyathophylloid or cup corals. There are mostly of the genera
Heliophyllum
(H.
halli
E. and H.),
Cystiphyllum
and
Zaphrentis,
and nearly all lie prostrate ... They show, however, no signs of wear, the
delicate bryozoans and small corals which encrust many of them, showing that
little if any disturbance has occurred ... They there-
724
William
A. Oliver, Jr.-Middle Devonian
fore
indicate a flourishing coral reef or forest, which was suddenly overwhelmed,
probably by the influx of muddy waters. . . "
Curiously
enough, the average size of the individuals in this lower Moscow (Windom
member) coral zone is much larger than at most of the outcrops of the
Centerfield and Tichenor coral zones in the West Central part of the state.
Grabau
also noted that the small rugose coral
Streptolasma
[
Stereoelasma],
common in the shales above and below the "coral layer," is not present in the
"coral layer" itself, a situation similar to that found in the Ludlowville
coral beds in central New York. Brachipods are common in the bed where the
corals are not concentrated but seem to be almost absent in the well developed
part of the coral bed (Grabau, 1899, p. 320).
A
similar coral bed is described by Shimer and Grabau (1902, p. 152) from the
vicinity of Thedford, Ontario. They state that it has the same position as the
Eighteen Mile Creek bed, but more recent work by Cooper and Warthin (1942, p.
878) indicates that it is Centerfield, not Tichenor, in age. The bed differs
from Grabau's "coral layer" in having a brachipod fauna equal in importance to
the coral fauna. Differences are also noted within the coral faunas, although
Heliophyllum
halli
and
Cystiphyllum
vesiculosum
[
americanum]
are very important in both beds.
Swmmary.
- These beds all have many features in common with the two great Ludlowville
coral beds. They are thin, bedded structures of considerable horizontal extent.
Further, they all have many coral genera and species in common which are
closely related to, or derived from, the Onondaga coral fauna. Notably lacking,
however, in the Ludlowville beds is the occurrence of the delicately ramose
Striatopora
and
Trachypora,
and hemispherical and pyriform forms of
Favosites
which are common in the other beds where the coral populations are not so
concentrated.
With
the exception of the Delphi coral bed and Cooper's
Meristella-Coral
zone, the beds described in this section are at either the Centerfield or
Tichenor horizons. These two limestone bands are both of great lateral extent,
and both indicative of rather calm, clear water environments where all forms of
marine life, corals included, flourished. The coral
725
Coral Beds of Central New York
beds
at these horizons seem to represent localized conditions here and there so
favorable to coral growth that other organisms were more or less excluded, but
nowhere so much so as in the Ludlowville coral beds in Onondaga County. They
differ markedly from the Ludlowville coral beds in their lateral relations.
Centerfield and Tichenor coral zones or beds are characterized by a complete
lateral faunal gradation into the normal "limestone," with isolated individuals
to be found at all exposures of the limestones. In contrast the Ludlowville
beds are isolated structures whose horizon is not recognizable away from the
coral beds proper either faunally or lithologically.
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS
The
coral biostromes of the Staghorn Point and Joshua submembers, represent
recurrences of relatively clear, warm, shallow water conditions, but less than
the reef optimum of Onondaga time. At these times of biostrome development,
corals were able to multiply rapidly and colonize whole areas to the nearly
complete exclusion of other organisms. Exceptionally favorable conditions for
solitary rugose corals were reached during Staghorn Point time and repeated in
Joshua time, and coral plantations spread over large areas.
Ripple
marks indicate that the sandstone platform below the Staghorn Point submember
was deposited by southeasterly currents which, probably as a result of shoaling
over the area concerned, bypassed the muds and left a residue of fine sand. The
cause of the shoaling as well as the relationship of the shallow area to
currents is unknown but the ripple marks indicate that the current was roughly
at right angles to the long dimension of the platform. The distribution of the
platform determined the lateral extent of rich coral colonization.
With
the sandy platform on which to establish a foothold, the corals were able
rapidly to expand their holdings over a broad area. Succeeding generations used
the skeletons of their predecessors as a substratum. Occasionally greater
influxes of muds than could be bypassed overwhelmed local areas, overturning
and abrading the corals. This is indicated by the coarse, irregular bedding of
the submember and by the worn condition of many of the corals, most of which are
726
William
A. Oliver, Jr.-Middle Devonian
not
in their living positions. Following such events the corals would quickly
reoccupy the area. Fanning or interfingering zones of corals at the extremities
of the bed indicate temporary extensions beyond the limits of the platform.
The
history of the Joshua submember is very similar to that of the Staghorn Point.
However, studies of the tabulate corals by Mrs. Mary Ross of Cornell University
show that Staghorn Point specimens are flat and expanded or branching forms
while the Joshua tabulates are thick, massive forms, many with knobby surfaces,
with none of the delicate, branching types. Studies of recent corals (Vaughan
and Wells, 1943, p. 60) have shown that branching forms are characteristic of
quiet, shallow water and that encrusting or massive forms are indicative of
rough water. While these criteria cannot positively be applied to the extinct
tabulates, it is likely that the reactions to rough water would be similar in
unrelated groups of similar form. The tabulates, then, suggest quiet, shallow
water conditions for the Staghorn Point coral bed, as postulated above, and
somewhat rougher water in Joshua times.
It
has been pointed out that there is no sandy platform beneath the Joshua
submember. Instead, at almost every exposure of the upper 'Coral bed there is a
basal Eridophyllum zone. Apparently this colonial rugose coral acted as' a
colonizer, the solitary corals only being able to establish themselves on the
"platform" formed by Eridophyllum skeletons. The orientation of this "platform"
(fig. 2) is more easily explainable. Modern coral reefs and banks are
ordinarily positioned at right angles to the direction of food carrying,
oxygenated water movements. A southeasterly current would thus be indicated by
the Joshua bed. This is not inconsistent with sedimentary evidence of general
current direction in this part of the Appalachian geosyncline during Devonian
time.
After
the establishment of the platform, further development was much the same as
that postulated for the Staghorn Point bed. The corals did not spread over so
great an area, but successful colonization endured longer. Extensions beyond
the "platform" met with the same lack of success, and the lateral relations of
the two coral beds with the Otisco shale are much the same.
The
beds were probably developed too far offshore to bear
727
Coral Beds of Central New York
any
special relationship to the eastern shore line. Easterly the Otisco gray shales
grade into sandy shales, sandstone, and finally continental deposits in a
distance of some eighty miles.
The
other coral beds cited from the Hamilton of New York occur in the same gray
shale phase (
Tropidoleptus
fauna) as the Ludlowville beds. There is a progressive stratigraphic rise
westward with this phase. The easternmost bed, Cooper's
Meristella
- Coral Zone (Berne. Quadrangle), is found in the top of the Marcellus
formation; in the Cazenovia Quadrangle, there is a thin coral bed in the
Skaneateles formation; in the Tully and Skaneateles Quadrangles are the great
coral beds of the Ludlowville formation; and there are weak coral beds in the
Ludlowville and Moscow formations farther westward in the state. This
regressive westward shift parallels the corresponding regressive shifts of the
more westerly dark or black shale phase (
Leiorhynchus
fauna) and the more easterly sandy, pelecypod phase. This westward regression
is presumably correlated with steadily rising land masses to the east.
Coral
bed development is but one aspect of the overall phase-facies relations of the
Hamilton group of deposits. This development reached its peak in the Staghorn
Point and Joshua biostromes when "forests" of corals covered many tens of
square miles, maintaining themselves for long periods of time, but ultimately
being overwhelmed by the muds.
REFERENCES
Those
articles marked with an asterisk (*) contain references to the
coral
beds, but are not mentioned in the text of this paper.
*Clarke,
J. M., 1919. Sixteenth report of the director of the state museum and science
department: New York State Mus. Bull. 227.
________and
Luther, D. D.,, 1905. Geologic map of the Tully quadrangle: New York State Mus.
Bull. 82, pp. 35-52.
Cleland,
H. F., 1903. Fauna of the Hamilton formation of the Cayuga Lake section in
central New York: U. S. Geol. Survey Bull. 206.
Cooper,
G. A., 1930. Stratigraphy of the Hamilton group of New York,, parts I and 2:
Am. Jour. Sci.., 5th ser., vol. 19, pp. 116-134, 214,236.
_______,1933-1934.
Stratigraphy of the Hamilton group of eastern New York, parts I and, 2: Am.
Jour. Sm., 5th ser., vol. 26. pp. 535-551; vol. 27, pp. 1-12.
_______,
and Warthin, A. S., Jr., 1942. New Devonian (Hamilton) correlations: Geol. Soc.
America Bull., vol. 53, pp. 873-988.
*_______,
et al., 1942. Correlation of Devonian sedimentary formations of North America:
Geol. Soc. America Bull., vol. 53, pp. 1729-1793.
Eaton,
Amos, 1832. Geological textbook for aiding the study of North American geology:
being a systematic arrangement of facts....., 2d ed., Albany.
728
William
A. Oliver, Jr.
Goldring,
Winifred, 1935. Geology of the Berne quadrangle: New York State Mus. Bull. 303.
Grabau,
A. W., 1898. Geology and paleontology of Eighteenmile Creek and the lake-shore
sections of Erie County: Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci. Bull., Vol. 6.
________,
1899. The fauna of the Hamilton group of Eighteenmile Creek and vicinity in
western New York: State Geologist, 16th Ann. Rept., pp. 227-339.
Hall,
James, 1843. Geology of New York. Part 4, comprising the survey of the fourth
geological district, Albany.
________,
1877. Illustrations of Devonian fossils of the Upper Helderberg, Hamilton and
Chemung groups, New York State Geol. Survey, Albany.
*Knapp,
E. B., 1888? Glimpses of the geology of Onondaga county, New York, Skaneateles,
New York.
*
Lecompte, M., 1938. Quelques types de "recifs" Siluriens et Devoniens de
l'Amerique du Nord: Essai de comparaison avec les recifs coralliens actuels:
Mus. royale historie nat. Belgique Bull., tome 14, no. 39.
Luther,
D. D., 1897. Economic geology of Onondaga county, New York: New York, State
Geologist, 15th Ann. Rept., pp. 237-303.
Payne,
T. G., 1938. The Genesee country: A field guide to various natural features
which reveal the geologic past: Rochester Mus. Arts Sci. Guide Bull. 5.
*
Schneider, P. F., 1894. Notes on the geology of Onondaga County, New York,
Syracuse.
*
Schuchert, C., 1943. Stratigraphy of the eastern and central United States,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
________,
and Dunbar, C. 0., 1941. A textbook of geology. Part 2, historical geology,
4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
Shimer,
H. W., and Grabau, A. W., 1902. Hamilton group of Thedford, Ontario: Geol. Soc.
America Bull., Vol. 13, pp. 149-186.
Slocum,
A. W., 1906. A list of Devonian fossils collected in western New York, with
notes on the stratigraphic distribution: Field Mus. Nat. History Pub., Geol.
ser., Vol. 2, pp. 257-265.
Smith,
Burnett, 1912. Observations on the structure of some coral beds in the Hamilton
shale: Philadelphia Acad. Nat. Sci. Proc., vol. 64, pp. 446-454.
________,
1935. Geology and mineral resources of the Skaneateles quadrangle: New York
State Mus. Bull. 300.
Vanuxem,
L., 1842. Geology of New York. Part 3., comprising the survey of the third
geological district, Albany.
Vaughan,
T. W., and Wells, J. W., 194-3. Revision of the suborders, families, and genera
of the Scleractenia: Geol. Soc. America Spec. Paper 44.
Wells,
J. W., 1937. Individual variation in the rugose coral species Heliophyllum
halli E. and H.: Palaeontographica Americana, vol. 2, no. 6.
Willard,
B., 1936. A Hamilton coral reef in Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania Acad. Sci. Proc.,
Vol. 10, pp. 30-36.
________,
1939. The Devonian of Pennsylvania; Middle and Upper Devonian: Pennsylvania
Topog. and Geol. Survey 4th ser., Bull. 19-G.
CORNELL
UNIVERSITY
ITHACA,
NEW YORK