cornwall england newspaper


1857 NEWS

ARTICLES, etc



6 FEBRUARY 1857, Friday


CAUTION - As Parties are travelling in various parts of Cornwall and Devon under the assumed name of SOLOMON and Co., Opticians, giving their address from Exeter and elsewhere, M. SOLOMON, Optician, 3 Lansdowne Terrace, Exeter, to prevent imposities[?], respectfully calls the attention of the public to the bottom of his circular, to his name in full (MYERS SOLOMON), whose spectacles have given such general satisfaction. A reward of GBP10 will be paid to any person giving such information as will lead to the conviction of any party or parties making use of the name of Myers Solomon, as no Agents are appointed by him. There is no other person of the name of Solomon carrying on the business of Optician in Exeter. Mr. M. Solomon intends visiting Cornwall in March next. Myers Solomon, Licensed Hawker, No. 1054 A.

DEATH OF Mr. WILLIAM KING NORWAY - It is with feelings of the liveliest regret that we announce the decease of Mr. Norway. He died, almost suddenly, in London on the evening of Friday last, aged 56 years. There are but few men in Cornwall who were better known, or whose loss would be more deeply lamented. For thirty years he had been conspicuously before the public eye, in his connection with the Press, with a variety of useful institutions, and as a man of versatile talents, and a wide range of literary and general information. His abilities as a political writer first attracted attention in the columns of the late Falmouth Packet, and so deep was the impression made by the vigour and pungency of his writings in that journal, that a handsome testimonial was presented to him at a public dinner, by a numerous body of his friends and admirers in East Cornwall. His views, on almost all matters of grave national interest, were such as have uniformly been advocated in this paper, to which, up to a very recent period, he had been a regular contributor for about twenty years. A distinguishing quality of his mind was its thorough earnestness. His opinions were not mere fancies, afloat on the surface of the mind, but saturated the whole man, - inhered in the very blood and bone. Yet with a tenacity of his cherished convictions which nothing could relax, there was the readiest appreciation of the merits of those who differed from him, and a natural warmth of personal kindliness and courtesy which drew to him the friendliest regards of men of the most diverse views. We should think he never had an enemy; nor do we remember ever to have heard a syllable uttered in disparagement of his feelings of his principles.

His school-days were passed at Eton, after which he was placed in training for the law, and entered on the business of his profession as a regular practitioner. But it cannot surprise any one who was acquainted with him that his career in this line was very brief. He might have said of the law, as Slender said of Anne Page, "There was but little love between us at the beginning, and it pleased Heaven to decrease it on further acquaintance." On giving up his professional engagements he devoted much of his time to literary pursuits, and entered with great ardour into the establishment of provincial institutions for the advancement of knowledge. One of the most successful of these was formed at his own residence, Wadebridge; and remains an honourable testimony to his devotedness to the public good. About five years ago, on the relinquishment of the secretaryship of the Reform Club by our respected townsman, Mr. BOND, the high character and well-known abilities of Mr. Norway marked him, in the estimation of the Committee, as a desirable successor. Of this post he discharged the various duties entirely to the satisfaction of the club, and remained in it up to the time of his decease.

His removal is a very sudden and unexpected event. The last time we saw him was about six months ago, when we met him at the Crystal Palace. He was then as healthful and sprightly as we had ever seen him, and was anticipating with much pleasure a holiday excursion on the continent. We see him at this moment, as he then stood by us on the Terrace on Penge Hill, watching the hues of a glowing sun-set, shed over that magnificent landscape. How little did we dream, at parting with him, that the sparkle of his eye, and warmth of his hand, were to be just as transient as the light then fading beyond the western hills. But so the companions of our pilgrimage are dropping, one by one, from our path; and of those of whom Death has lately bereft us there are few whose loss will be more deeply or generally felt than the subject of this brief notice.

FROM OUR LONDON CORRESPONDENT - We have now abundant evidence of the distress among the working classes. For a week past, bands of unemployed persons have been parading the streets in order to excite charity, and their orderly and respectful conduct shows that their case is one of real hardship. The unemployed consist chiefly of bricklayers, carpenters, and painters; but since the setting in of the frost, the list has been considerably swelled by gardeners, and the field-labourers of the suburbs. It is supposed that so many as fifty thousand persons are now out of employment in the metropolis. No danger to the state of order, or to property, has been threatened as yet, but such a state of things cannot continue for any length of time without producing a popular commotion. It is a very hard thing for men to starve in sight of the wealth and abundance which are everywhere displayed in this capital. If no improvement take place in the labour market, it will be necessary, for the security of property, if not for the sake of the starving operatives, that the government should devise some means of alleviating the general distress. Public works have been talked of, and possibly a remedy may be found in this direction on a legitimate basis - many government building schemes being already in contemplation. Such measurers, however, are not congenial to English ideas of the natural laws of supply and demand; and it would be well if the cause of the present derangement of affairs were fully ascertained, in order that we may know whether it be due to an accident of the moment, or some radical disease in our commercial prosperity. The question is a momentous one.

PARISH OF TEMPLE - Surrounded by extensive and dreary moors, to which it gives its name, lies the little parish of Temple, formerly the property of the Knights Templars. It is six miles from Bodmin, its post town contains 936 acres, five houses, and inhabitants at different periods as follows:- 1801 - 15; 1811 - 18; 1821 - 27; 1831 - 29; 1841 - 37; 1851 - 24. The population has from time to time varied considerably. "When I lived in the parish," said old Mr. BURNARD, who has been dead a great number of years, "one half of the men in it were hanged for sheep stealing." At the period here referred to the number of male inhabitants did not exceed two. DAVIES GILBERT says its church has disappeared; this is not the case. The average height of the walls is at this moment not less than three or four feet, and of the tower a considerable portion still stands, and the archway from the church, the only way of access to it, is still entire. The church is fifty-four feet long, and sixteen feet eight inches wide, with a north transept fifteen feet by fourteen feet. The materials of the fallen building lie about in reproachful abundance, as if waiting to be replaced - and a great pity it is they are not. "I wish," said ANTONY HOSKEN, "they'd see and build up the church, t'would be so comfortable like to have a croom of preaching again." It has been in ruins about sixty years. The bell was twice stolen, and after the second theft was irrecoverably lost. An ash tree of considerable size occupies the western end of the nave; the tomb-tablet or head-stone is now to be seen, and only about half-a-dozed graves. The last funeral was that of DANIEL LORD's first wife.

The living has been twice augmented by Queen Anne's bounty. It is a curacy in the gift of the Devonshire family of WREY. The tithes are commuted at GBP27. 10s. It was formerly attached to Blisland, but now the surplice duty is performed by the rector of Warleggan, who keeps the registrars. In the inquisition of the Bishops of Lincoln and Winchester into the value of Cornish benefices, in 1294, Capella de Temple was rated in first fruits at 10s. Norden writing about the year 1610, says "it is a place exempted from the bishop's jurisdiction, appertaining in former times to the Templars. It is a lawless church, as they call it, where many bad marriages, where or howsoever contracted are consummated, and here were they wont to bury such as had wrought violent death upon themselves."

The parish produces stream tin. The land is chiefly used for grazing. Both churchyard and glebe have been occupied for that purpose for a great number of years by Mr. STEPHENS, land surveyor, of Steppes, near Bodmin, as tenant under the rector of Warleggan.

BRITISH PROTECTOR LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY - On Monday evening, the 19th ult., a dinner was given by the shareholders and assurers at St. Mary's Scilly, in connextion with the above company at Tregarthen's Hotel, to some of the company's representatives, and for the purpose of celebrating the very marked progress of the "British Protector." The shareholders and assurers, forty-six in number, at seven o'clock sat down to a very excellent and varied repast, served up with all the taste, skill, and profusion for which the kind hostess, Mrs. TREGARTHEN, is justly celebrated. After the removal of the cloth, the usual loyal and other toasts were given in a spirited manner by the chairman on the occasion, Mr. J. G. MOYLE, medical officer, and duly responded to. Then followed the toasts of the evening, "The health of Mr. J. N. GORDON, managing director," which was given with enthusiasm, and feelingly acknowledged. "The health of Mr. W. J. MOORE," - manager of the Western Branch. This was given and received in the most cordial manner, as all present were aware of the exertions of this gentleman to promote and forward the best interests of the society. The healths of Mr. E. WOTTON, travelling agent; Mr. J. G. MOYLE, medical officer, Mr. C. W. MUMFORD, local agent, and several other toasts connected with the officers and principals of the institution were then proposed, and replied to in such a way as to afford a great deal of useful information, and the party separated highly pleased with the social intercourse enjoyed and the amount of knowledge obtained. The interest of the proceedings was considerably enhanced by the cheerful and satisfactory answers of the managers present to all questions of shareholders and policy-holders put to them.

On the following evening a public meeting was held, - the Rev. A. W. McDONALD in the chair, when Mr. J. N. GORDON, Mr. W. J. MOORE, and Mr. WOTTON, addressed a very large and attentive audience, who expressed their satisfaction by proposing and unanimously giving a vote of thanks to the lecturer, and a vote of confidence in the Institution. On Wednesday evening a full attendance was secured at St. martin's, when the same gentleman gave addresses on the "present position and prospects of the British Protector Company," fully and satisfactorily proving the sound principles on which it is based, and the rapidly advancing progress of this well-deserving and flourishing Assurance Society.

LOSTWITHIEL - MEETING OF THE BOOT AND SHOE TRADE - A numerously attended meeting of the master boot and shoe makers of Lostwithiel, Bodmin, St. Blazey, Tywardreath, Fowey, St. Veep, and places adjacent, was held at the King's Arms Inn, on Tuesday last, for the purpose of adopting such measures as the present very high price of leather render necessary. Mr. BROAD, of St. Blazey, was called to the chair, who said that for ages the trade had been far behind other trades in point of remuneration, for whilst other masters could retire, who had ever heard of a shoemaker living on his means, although an equal amount of ability and industry had been exercised. Bad, however, as it always had been, it was now worse, in consequence of the very great advance in the price of leather. Wages had also risen to a considerable extent, but he considered journeymen where not yet paid as they should be. Mr. HOOPER, of Fowey, said all were painfully aware of the disadvantages with which the trade at present had to contend. For two years past he had carried on rather an extensive trade without fair remuneration, but with the present prices it was a positive loss. The masters were willing to bear a large proportion of the burden, but the public must share with them, by submitting to an advance in price. Mr. COLE, of St. Veep, said he had paid minute attention to the cost of materials, and in many instances found it fully equal to the price charged when made up. This was especially so with heavy goods. Mr. RUTTER, of St. Blazey, said an advance of twenty-five per cent. would not put the trade on a footing equal with other trades. Mr. HAM, of Bodmin, said the trade, always bad, was now considerably worse. He had for many years conducted his trade with the utmost caution, using great economy and industry, for merely a subsistence; but under present circumstances it would not pay at all. Mr. Hooper then proposed an advance of twenty to twenty-five per cent., which was seconded by Mr. WILLIAM TALLING, of Lostwithiel, who said the advance proposed was only fair and just, when you take into consideration that the raw material had advanced as much as 300 per cent., and he could see no reason why shoemakers should not live as well as other trades. A vote of thanks was then passed to the chairman, and to those present who had exerted themselves in getting up the meeting on this necessary occasion. The company then separated, determined to adhere to the resolutions of the meeting.

SUFFERERS FROM SHIPWRECK - At the weekly meetings of the committee of the Shipwrecked Mariners' Society for the month of January, held at their offices, Hibernia Chambers, London Bridge, the gold medal of the institution was awarded to Mr. JOHN BAMFIELD, master of the "Wave Queen," of Jersey, and the silver medal to JOHN ROMERIL, one of the seamen who accompanied him, for having in a small boat during a gale of wind gallantly rescued the crew of the "Briton" screw steamer from their foundering vessel and landed them sale at Jersey.

GREAT NORTHERN HOSPITAL - Mr. ROBERT CHARLES HUNTER, late House Surgeon to the Great Northern Hospital, has been appointed Accoucheur to the same institution. Mr. WILLIAM HILLMAN, of Lyme Regis, succeeds Mr. HUNTER as House Surgeon.

QUEEN'S SCHOLARSHIP - It is gratifying to find that all the candidates for Queen's Scholarships, belonging to Church of England schools, in Cornwall, who were examined at Christmas last, have succeeded in obtaining scholarships of the first class. This position entitles them to a two years' training and board and lodging at one of the Normal Colleges, with an addition of GBP10 for personal expenses. The successful competitors were W. F. MILL, and E. J. OKE, from Mr. Basset's school, Pool; Mr. A. JENKIN, Crowan; W. S. TREGEAR, St. Just; and E. J. POLKINHORNE, Training School, Truro.

THE CUSTOMS - Mr. MALLEY, comptroller at Padstow, has been appointed to the same office at Bideford. Mr. W. H. HOLMES, jun., principal coast officer and landing waiter at Hayle, has been appointed to act as deputy receiver of wreck for the district extending from Lelant side of Hayle Bar to Godrevy Point.

THE GODREVY LIGHTHOUSE - We are informed that Mr. MICHAEL WILLIAMS, M.P., for West Cornwall has, received a reply to the letter he had addressed on this subject to the secretary of the Trinity Board. The Secretary's letter is dated 28th January 1857, and is to the effect "that it has been decided to erect a lighthouse on Godrevy Island, that it had been referred to their engineer, and it was hoped it would be begun in the course of a few months."

IMPORTANT SHIPPING CASE - At the East Kirrier Petty Sessions, held at Penryn, on Wednesday the 27th ult., before Mr. ENYS and a full bench of magistrates, RICHARD HENRY RICHARDS, master of the brig "Voluna," of the port of Padstow, 336 tons burthen, was summoned to answer the complaint of Mr. FREDERICK SWATMAN, collector of customs and shipping master of the port of Falmouth, for that he being the master of a certain foreign going ship called the "Voluna," of 100 tons burden and upwards, did, in and about the month of August last, employ WILLIAM GEORGE as mate of the said ship, without ascertaining that he was possessed of a certificate of competency or service, contrary to the form of the statute, &c. Mr. TILLY appeared on behalf of the prosecution, and Mr. MOORMAN for the defence. Mr. Tilly, in opening the case, stated that the proceedings were instituted under the directions of the Board of Trade, and that the offence with which the defendant was charged was in breach of the 136 sect. of the M.S.A., 1854, and after fully directing the attention of the bench to the law bearing upon the subject and the facts of the case, he called Mr. Frederick Swatman, Collector of Customs at Falmouth, who stated that on the 26th August, defendant, who was then the master of the "Voluna," called on him and produced his articles, and required the ship to be cleared for a voyage from Falmouth to Quebec, and back to a final port of discharge in the United Kingdom; but that perceiving there was no chief mate he refused to clear the ship. On the 28th, defendant again called on him with THOMAS LUTEY, whom he stated had engaged as mate, and who produced his certificate and signed the articles as mate, when witness gave defendant his clearance for the ship. On the 29th, witness received the form schedule G signed by defendant, stating that Thomas Lutey had left the ship from sickness; and on the 30th the "Voluna" sailed from Falmouth on her voyage to Quebec, without a chief mate having a certificate appropriate to his station. In support of the case Mr. Tilly put in the ship's articles under the scale of the Board of Trade, dated 26th August, 1856, in which Thomas Lutey appeared as chief mate, and William George as second mate, with a certificate of clearance annexed. He also put in the official log book of the "Voluna," in which was the following entry - "August 30th, Falmouth, Thomas Lutey, mate, was taken sick, sent him on shore as he was unfit to proceed the voyage; William George, second mate, takes the chief mate's place to proceed to Quebec and back to Fowey. Signed Richard H. Richards, master; William George, mate." Mr. Tilly also put in schedule G dated 29th August, signed by defendant, stating that Thomas Lutey had left the ship from sickness; also list C. being an account of the crew at the end of the voyage, dated "Fowey, 24th December, 1856," in which William George appeared as second mate, and also the release of the crew signed by William George.

On being cross-examined by Mr. Moorman, Mr. Swatman stated that Captain LANGFORD, the ship's husband, came to the custom-house, with Lutey, when he signed articles. JOHN JOHNS stated that he shipped in the "Voluna" as seaman, on the 26th August, and sailed in her throughout her voyage from Falmouth to Quebec and back to Fowey and that William George acted as chief mate. Mr. Moorman on behalf of the defendant, then addressed the court, stating that he should prove that in this case Captain Langford, the ship's agent, was the whole and sole employer, and that the defendant was coerced into sailing without a chief mate. He then called William George, who stated that he was hired by Captain Langford as second mate, the defendant having nothing to do with his employment. On the 29th of August, Captain Langford told him that when at sea he was to take the office of chief mate, and that the entry in the official log produced, although dated at Falmouth, was in fact made after they had left the port and were at sea. Mr. Tilly objected to oral evidence being given against the written statement in the log. The magistrates, however, decided on receiving it subject to exceptions. On cross-examination, witness admitted that he had no recollection of seeing Lutey on board the "Voluna," or that his outfit for the voyage had been sent on board; that he acted as chief mate under the superior orders of Captain Langford, whom he considered his employer. Richard Henry Richards, the defendant, stated that Captain Langford was the ship's husband; that he employed Lutey and George, and that witness had nothing to do with their engagement or their rate of wages. That he sailed by the orders of Captain Langford without a chief mate, and that the entry in the official log-book was made at sea and not at Falmouth. On cross-examination he admitted that he knew he was doing what was wrong; that it was only his second voyage as master; and that he was coerced into doing it by Captain Langford, who assured him that he would hole him harmless. The magistrates gave the following decision:- "We adjourn our decision in this case to the next Petty Sessions; if, in the meantime, summonses are applied for against the owner and ship's husband, both or either of them, they will be granted, and hear before judgment in this case is pronounced."

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY - At the London Court of Bankruptcy, on Monday last, before Mr. Commissioner GOULBURN, the case of Mr. F. JOHNS came before the court. The bankrupt was described as a timber and coal merchant, of Hackney, and Gweek, in the parish of Wendron. Mr. LAWRENCE said he had no objection to an adjournment. The bankrupt had been partner in a large timber business in the West of England, of the solvency of which house there could be no doubt, and there were certain partnership accounts to be obtained. Adjourned accordingly.

BODMIN COUNTY COURT - Held at the Assize Hall on Wednesday the 4th instant. In the case of MILROY v. AMELIA GRANT, of Bodmin, defendant was committed for thirty days for not having satisfied judgment of the court.

SARGENT v. SEYMOUR - This was an action brought by Mr. THOMAS SARGENT, of Liskeard, against Captain JOHN SEYMOUR, of Polscoe, near Lostwithiel, for recovery of the sum of GBP50, on a dishonoured Bill of Exchange, due the 11th of November, 1854. The amount was reduced to GBP50, the excess being abandoned to bring the action within the jurisdiction of the court. Mr. WALLIS appeared for plaintiff and Mr. COMMINS for defendant. Notice of the dishonour not having been given to defendant for some days, his Honor considered the notice not sufficient and gave a verdict for the defendant.

DESERTION OF A FAMILY - On Monday last a man named JOHN SYMONS, a miner was brought on shore from the Dublin Company's steamer by the Falmouth police, and lodged in the station house lock-up, with a female who had gone on board with him. In the evening he was charged before the magistrates with having deserted his wife and children who appeared in court, and the case being proved, he was committed to prison for three months with hard labour. The woman who went on board with him was discharged. Symons was escorted to the prison by a large mob, who hooted and yelled, and had the police not protected him he would have fared badly.

A DISGRACEFUL ACT - On Wednesday evening the 28th ultimo, the postman, whose duty it is to clear the postal pillar in Clarence-street, Penzance, did so a little after nine o'clock. The contents, with other letters, were placed on a table in the post-office, but as Miss SWAINE and her assistant took up letter after letter to stamp, they could their arms smarting, and a further search disclosed that some corrosive liquid had been thrown over the letters taken from the Clarence-street pillar. The addresses of some were effaced; others partially so; and all those were sealed up and forwarded to the General Post-Office. A reward of GBP10 was promptly offered, as yet without any effect, and an inspector from the General Post-Office will investigate the matter.

CHILD DESERTION - In reference to the case of child desertion which we noticed last week, Mr. S. BENNALLACK of Probus, writes to the effect that Mr. JORY, carpenter of Probus, has no daughter called Mary Jane Jory, and has no other daughter living at Penzance. It would appear that the woman who brought the child to Mr. NASH, police superintendant at Truro, stated an untruth in calling herself the daughter of Mr. Jory, of Probus, Mr. Bennallack thinks the affair was concocted by some disreputable female, in order to get rid of her child, and so far the scheme was successful, it being sent to the union house. Mr. Bennallack hopes that in justice to the public, Mr. Nash, or some other active office, will sift the affair, and bring the guilty parties to justice.

STEALING TURNIPS - On Tuesday last, before the Mayor of Truro, and Captain KEMPE, magistrate, SAMUEL TAYLOR, labourer of Truro, was charged with stealing a quantity of turnips, the property of JOHN PLUMMER, a farmer, at Kenwyn Church-town. It appeared that Mr. Plummer occupies a farm near Kenwyn church, and adjoining a turnip field on his farm is the road leading from the turnpike to the church. On the Wednesday previous a farmer, named HERCULES SOLOMON, of Short-lane's-end, was passing in a cart, and saw the prisoner Taylor in the road with a bag, into which he was putting turnips as fast as they were thrown over the hedge to him by a man in the field. Solomon went on some distance, but then returned, and going up to Taylor, asked him what he had got in his bag. Taylor, in reply, made use of some very bad expressions. Solomon said he should take him into custody, and take him to Plummer for stealing his turnips. Taylor said, if he came near him he would put a knife into him; Taylor then threw the turnips out of the bag and walked away. Mr. Solomon gave information to Mr. Plummer, and described the man. Mr. Plummer gave the same description of the man at the Truro police station, and on Monday last, Taylor was apprehended, and identified by HERCULES SOLOMON as the man whom he saw putting the turnips in the bag. Mr. Plummer had a quantity of turnips in the field which had been recently drawn, and he could not prove whether the stolen turnips had been drawn, or taken from the heap. The prisoner stated that the turnips were drawn, which was the lesser office, and for which he was committed for one month to hard labour.

PENZANCE POLICE - At the Guildhall, on the 28th ult., before Mr. T. COULSON, mayor, Capt. THOMAS BENNETTS, of the schooner "Union," of Belfast, charged JAMES HIGGINS, one of his crew, with desertion on the 28th. Higgins received a month's advance at Cardiff, and on the vessel's putting in here for repairs left her, as did the rest of the crew, except the mate and a boy. His excuse was that the vessel was unseaworthy, but the captain disproved this. The "Union" was fourteen years old, North American built, sheathed with zinc, and only sprung a leak in consequence of the late severe weather. Higgins was committed for a month.

CAMBORNE PETTY SESSIONS - On Tuesday last, RICHARD SPARNON and STEPHEN BENNETTS, of the parish of Camborne, were summoned before the magistrates for an assault on Mr. and Mrs. HUNTER, of the Hotel, at Tuckingmill, on the 17th ult. The case was fully proved, and they were find GBP2 each and expenses, amounting altogether to GBP6. The fine was paid.

ST. AUSTELL PETTY SESSIONS - WILLIAM CROWLE, Charlestown, was summoned for being drunk and disorderly in the Market-house, and having been twice previously convicted of a similar office, he was ordered to find sureties to keep the peace for three months himself in GBP10, and two sureties in GBP5 each.

HENRY BRAGG, a waggoner of St. Dennis, was fined 5S. and costs for leaving his waggon without a driver in the street.

ACCIDENT - On Wednesday last, a young woman named MARY ROWE, when on her way from Helston to Constantine, in getting out of the cart to lead the horse, fell, and the cartwheels passed over her arm and leg, fracturing them both in a dreadful manner. She is in a very precarious condition, but hopes are entertained of her recovery.

CORONERS' INQUEST - The following inquests have been held by Mr. JOHN CARLYON county coroner:- On the Tuesday the 29th ult., at Shallow Adit, Redruth, on the body of MARTHA ANN GOLSWORTHY, aged 7 years, who caught her clothes on fire on Tuesday during the temporary absence of her mother who had gone for a course of water, and was so seriously burnt before she returned that she only survived a few hours. Verdict "Accidental death."

On Tuesday last, at Gwennap, on the body of a newly-born female, which a single woman called ANN JENKIN had given birth to early on Monday morning. SAMUEL JENKIN, the grandfather of the child, deposed that on Thursday evening, having heard that his daughter was in the family way, he questioned her on the subject, and she most positively denied that such as the case. On Sunday evening he and his wife went to bed about half-past nine o'clock; his daughter had got up about ten minutes before, and her two sisters and her brother - the eldest aged 8, and the youngest 2 1/2 years, slept in the same bed with her, and in the same room with the witness and his wife. He heard no disturbance in the course of the night, and a few minutes after five on Monday morning he called his daughter to go down and get breakfast for him; which she did. As soon as he had finished breakfast he went to a mine to work; but he had not been there long before he was sent for, and on returning home found that his daughter had had a child in the course of the night, and the child was then lying dead in a flasket down stairs. He then went to inform the constable of it, and the coroner was sent for.

ANNE JENKIN, wife of the last witness, and grandmother of the child, deposed that she came down stairs on Monday morning just as her husband had finished breakfast and was going out to work; and a few minutes afterwards her daughter told her that she had had a child in bed about one o'clock that morning, and that she lay perfectly still until she got down to get breakfast for her father, when she brought the child down with her and placed it in a flasket; and witness, on looking into the flasket found the child there, dead, wrapped up in an old frock; and she immediately went to the mine to fetch her husband. She also had charged her daughter on two occasions, with being in the family way, and each time she positively denied it.

Mr. PENBERTHY, surgeon, who examined the body, deposed that it was that of a full-timed female child, and there were no external marks of violence on any part of it. On opening the chest he found the lungs small in volume; the right one partially inflated, and it crackled under pressure; but the left lung had never been inflated. He was of opinion that, although the child had breathed, it had died before it was fully born, either from the bed clothes pressing on it, or from some other accidental cause in the act of birth. All the other internal organs were healthy, and he had every reason to suppose that if the mother had had proper medical assistance at the time of birth, the child would have been born alive and done well. This being the whole of the evidence, the coroner told the jury that in consequence of there being no proof that the child had been born and that it had an independent existence, the office, if any, was one of concealment of birth, which must come under the cognisance of a magistrate and not the coroner. The jury coincided with this view of the case and returned a verdict that there was no proof that the child was born alive. The jury was composed of seventeen of the most respectable inhabitants of the neighbourhood. No doubt some steps will be taken to bring the case before another tribunal.

On the same day at Tregony, on the body of FRANCIS WOOLCOCK, mason, aged seventy-three years, who died in a very sudden and unexpected manner, on Monday morning. Verdict, "Death from natural causes."

The following inquests have been held by Mr. HICHENS, county coroner:- On the 29th ultimo, in the parish of St. Hilary, on the body of JOSIAH MATTHEWS, aged 50 years, who was found dead in his bed on the preceding day. Verdict, "Natural death."

On Tuesday last, in the borough of St. Ives, on the body of ELEANOR STEPHENS, aged 76 years. The deceased, on Saturday evening last, whilst occupied in preparing her husband's supper, fell to the floor in a state of insensibility, from which she shortly recovered, and having been put to bed, rose on the following morning in her usual health, which considering her great age, was good. In the afternoon of that day, whiles occupied in wiping out a kittle, in which dinner had been dressed, she fell again to the floor in a fit, from which she partially recovered, but she had frequent returns of the attack, which at length terminated in her death, about eleven o'clock at night. Verdict, "Natural death."

INQUEST ON Mr. W. K. NORWAY - On Monday morning last, an inquest was held in the saloon of the Reform Club-house, Pall-mall, before Mr. CHARLES ST. CLAIR BEDFORD, coroner for Westminster, and fourteen jurors, of whom Mr. THOMAS HENRY was foreman, upon view of the body of the deceased gentleman, who was stated to have been fifty-six years of age. Mr. SAMUEL NORWAY, of 2 Marlborough-terrace, Harrow-road, surgeon, brother of deceased, stated that the latter was an attorney by profession. Witness was present at his last illness, which took place at six o'clock in the evening of Friday last. He came to see deceased on that occasion at half-past four o'clock - having been sent for on account of his sudden and serious illness. On arriving at the club-house, he found the pupils of deceased's eyes were much contracted, and that he was breathing with the greatest difficulty. About half-an-hour before his death, he became partially sensible, but did not speak. Had no doubt he was labouring under the effects of opium. Was not aware that he had been in the habit of taking opium. Saw a small bottle in the room capable of holding two drachms of laudanum. Witness knew of no reason for deceased having taken laudanum to destroy himself. He had been affected with rheumatic gout. He might have taken laudanum on that account. Had no doubt he died from the effects of that poison. By a Juror: he had been attended by a medical man, Mr. VACEY, who was present. Mr. CHARLES KINFORD VACEY, 74 St. Martin's Lane, surgeon, stated that he had attended the deceased about six or seven weeks since for an attack of rheumatic gout, when the medicine prescribed for him having an effect on the bowels, which was not intended, he sent him the two-drachm bottle produced, filled with laudanum with directions to take about eight or ten drops with each dose of medicine.

By the Coroner: That would not be a large dose for a person not accustomed to take laudanum. A much larger dose was often given to produce sleep. Witness continued: On Thursday last deceased had another attack of gout, and sent to him (witness) for some laudanum, when the same two-drachm phial was again filled and sent by the messenger, a boy belonging to the club-house. Witness afterwards called upon the deceased, and again prescribed for and sent him some medicine. This was about three o'clock in the afternoon. There was no laudanum in that medicine. Heard nothing of him until the next day (Friday), about two o'clock in the afternoon, when he attended by direction and found deceased very ill, evidently labouring under symptoms produced by opium, from the pupils of the eyes being contracted, and being under lethargy and coma, and sterterous breathing. No doubt he died from the effects of laudanum. Witness should not have thought the quantity sufficient to have caused the death of the deceased; in fact it is the smallest dose on record that has produced a fatal effect in an adult. He did not think it would have destroyed the life of one man in a thousand. By the Coroner: If affected with disease of the brain or bronchitis it might have been fatal, but should say it would not have had such effect on persons because affected with gout or rheumatism. Witness continued: Had been told that another boy besides the one referred to had fetched laudanum for the deceased, but that boy, as he now understood, was in the country.

By a Juror: Had no doubt deceased was in a sound state of mind. W. HENRY TIPPETT, one of the footmen at the club-house, deposed to finding the deceased dangerously ill, as also to his having been bled, about a pint of blood being taken from deceased. Dr. GOLDSWORTHY GURNEY, of the House of Commons, said he knew the deceased well, having attended him when twenty-fix years of age on several occasions. He was affected with a peculiar irritable state of the stomach, which has an unusual sympathy on the brain, so much so that he (witness) had known two or three glasses of wine to throw him into a state of torpor, sometimes approaching to delirium. He in consequence suffered morally in reputation, and at the request of witness, he abstained from spirits or wine, and became what is called a tee-totaller. Witness thought therefore, that the two drahms of laudanum might have had a fatal effect upon him, although he thought it would not have had the same result with one man in a thousand. Witness had attended the father of deceased, who died from being similarly affected. Had no doubt deceased died from the effects of laudanum. Considered deceased well knew the nature and power of laudanum, and was of opinion that had he intended to destroy his life, that instead of two drachms he would have taken at least two ounces. It was further stated that no boy from the club-house had fetched any laudanum, excepting what was known to Mr. Vacey, deceased's medical attendant, and by the desire of Mr. S. Norway, the brother of deceased, it was shown by the evidence of Mr. R. W. CHILDS that his affairs were correct. The jury, after a brief consultation, returned a verdict that the deceased died from the effects of opium which he had taken accidentally to alleviate pain, and not suicidally.


13 FEBRUARY 1857, Friday


WHEREAS - My Wife, ELIZABETH KELLOW, has left me; I Hereby Give Notice, that I will not be answerable for any Debt she may incur, THOMAS KELLOW's Mark. Witness to signature - THOMAS DAVEY. Camel Quarry, Wadebridge, February 9th, 1857.

NEWSPAPER CIRCULATION - A Return to an Order of the House of Commons dated 11th of July, 1855, of the number of stamps issued to newspapers in the United Kingdom from he 31st day of December, 1854, to the 1st day of July, 1855, has been printed. The following were supplied to the newspapers printed in Cornwall during the six month:- West Briton ...88,500. All the other Papers printed in Cornwall ...41,709.

At Little Beside, in the parish of Gwennap, there lives a labouring man about thirty-six years of age, of the name of JOHN WALES, who is unable either to read or write, or even to spell his own name, but who, by seeming intuition, and with the utmost readiness, gives correct answers to any arithmetical questions which may be proposed to him, however lengthy or complicated. It is said that the late Lord Raglan jocosely betted with some other military gentlemen on one occasion at Alderney, that Wales would not answer this question:- If six grains of powder will project a cannon ball six feet one inch and one-eighth of an inch, how much powder would be required to project the same ball three millions of miles? Wales answered the question in twenty minutes, and received from the officers GBP10 of the bet won on the occasion. It cost one of the Ordnance officers three hours to test the accuracy of the answer.

APPOINTMENT OF HIGH SHERIFF - Sir HENRY ONSLOW Bart., of Hengar, has been appointed sheriff of this county for the ensuing year.

THE NEW RECORDER OF FALMOUTH - Mr. EDWARD W. COX, of the Western Circuit, has been appointed Recorder of the boroughs of Falmouth and Helston, vice Mr. C. BEVAN, appointed County Court Judge for Cornwall.

THE ROMISH CHURCH - It is stated that the Rev. T. S. LIVIUS, late curate of Kea, was received into the Catholic Church by Father Coffin, at the Redemptorist's Church, Clapham, on Tuesday the 5th instant.

DISASTER AT SEA - CHARLES CREWS, master, and ROBERT CARE, mate of the schooner "Jane," of Truro, have made a statement to the following effect, before the Receiver of Wrecks at this port:- That a voyage from Newport to Truro, coal laden, whilst about three leagues west of Lundy Island, on Saturday the 24th January, at eleven p.m., in a strong gale from N. E., and in a heavy sea, the vessel sprung a leak. The pumps were kept constantly going, and several heavy seas were shipped, carrying away the bulwarks; the vessel became gradually waterlogged, and the leak increased as they proceeded down channel. At seven a.m. on Sunday, they gibed the ship, and in attempting to haul her towards the Land's End, shipped a heavy sea, which carried away the gripes of the boat, twisted the keel out of her, swept away two of the fore and two of the main shrouds, and at the same time the mate and a seaman were washed from the pumps, and nearly taken overboard. To prevent the masts going over the side, they were compelled to keep the vessel before wind and tide. About three p.m., the same day, being then about three and a half leagues S. of the Land's End, saw a steamer steering towards them and on nearing they showed a flat of distress. The vessel immediately bore down upon them, and asked what assistance was wanted. They stated that the "Jane" was in a sinking state, and a complete wreck, with canvas split and boat disabled, and that they wished to be taken off, there being no possibility of taking the vessel into port. The master of the steamer (the "James Brown," of Glasgow, from Cardiff for Bordeaux launched his life-boat, took them off and proceeded on his voyage to Bordeaux, where they were landed, and from thence they were sent home by the British Consul. The weather was so tempestuous, and the vessel so unmanageable, that they were unable to save more than the clothes about them.

REDRUTH COUNTY COURT - The only cases of any interest which were heard on the first day were CRAZE v. EDDY, and WHEAR v. PHILLIPS. The former case, after having been heard at some length was, on payment of costs by the plaintiff, for the first time postponed for the production of additional evidence. In the other case, Whear, a stationer of Camborne, sued Phillips, a common carrier, for GBP3. 16s. 6d., the value of a parcel of paper which it was alleged had been sent by Phillips's conveyance from Falmouth for Whear, but which the latter declared had never been delivered. Phillips and his driver, BAWDEN, swore most positively and circumstantially to the delivery of the goods, which were packed in a tea-chest, which they declared they carried between them into Whear's shop on the evening of the 13th of February, 1855, and which, as Mr. Whear was not in the shop, was not paid for; that in consequence of that non-payment it was entered in defendant's day-book, the entry being afterwards marked "paid" on receipt of the money. The day-book, having every appearance of genuineness, was put in as evidence. Mr. Whear and his brother, a lad who, at the time of the transaction, was thirteen years of age, both swore positively that the 13th of February being the day before Valentine's day, the demand for valentines was so great as to require them both to be in the shop all the evening, and that no parcel was delivered there on that occasion. His Honor, in giving judgment, said it was a case involving considerable difficulty, but he thought, under the circumstances, without any imputation of dishonesty to either party, judgment must be for the plaintiff. On the part of defendant, Mr. HY. ROGERS immediately gave notice of motion for a new trial.

HIGH-LANES PETTY SESSIONS - On Monday the 2nd instant, Mr. RALPH MITCHELL, of the parish of St. Just, was summoned before the magistrates for refusing to pay 4s. 6d. for a church-rate. He said it was opposed to his principles and he would not pay it. The magistrates therefore made an order for the amount and costs.

SALVAGE - On Tuesday last, at Penzance, the Mayor and Justices were called on to adjudicate on a claim made by THOMAS CARBIS, and five others, pilots of the port, on Capt. DOWVES, master of the Dutch galliot "Hewen de main," on the 7th. The galliot was boarded half a mile from the pier, while it was blowing hard from the S.S.W., with a heavy sea. The captain refused assistance, but his vessel soon got into danger and he requested the pilots to return. The vessel was dragging her anchor and approaching broken water. When she was safe the captain offered the pilots 10s. and afterwards GBP5. The point was whether the Dutch vessel dragged her anchor. This was affirmed and denied stoutly on each side, and Mr. PEARCE ably contended that the pilotage was mere ordinary labour and should be rewarded as such. The claim was for GBP50. The bench awarded GBP15 and costs. Mr. R. MILLETT for the pilots.

TRURO POLICE - On Monday, before the Mayor, Mr. NANKIVELL, Mr. PADDON, Capt. KEMPE, Mr. CHAPPEL, and Dr. BARHAM, JAMES HARRISON, alias LARY O'BRIEN, a vagrant, was charged with assaulting ANNA MARIA MURROUGH in Kenwyn Street, on Saturday night last. He was fined 5s. and costs, and in default of payment was committed to the house of correction for twenty days. Anna Maria Murrough, a prostitute, was committed to the house of correction for fourteen days hard labour, for being drunk and disorderly and using obscene language in Kenwyn Street, on Saturday night.

On Wednesday, before the Mayor, and Mr. PADDON, and Mr. CHAPPEL, HENRY THOMAS PHILLIPS, alias ELLIS, of Zennor, was charged with fraudulently enlisting in the Royal Cornwall Rangers Militia at Truro, having been previously enrolled in that corps at Falmouth. He was committed to the house of correction for three months' hard labour.

On the 12th instant, FRANCIS GRAY, landlord of the Falcon beer-shop, was summoned before the Mayor, Mr. CHAPPEL, and Mr. PADDON, for having his house open till a quarter to four o'clock on Saturday morning. He was fined 10s. and expenses.

ROBBERY AT A MINE - A robbery took place last week at Wheal Margaret Mine, in the parish of Lelant. A man called SAMUEL HALL, a miner, left his watch in the engine house, whilst he went underground, and when he came up it had been taken away. Suspicion arose against a man who left the mine the day after, and Hall was advised to go to Helston to consult the conjuror, but hearing the old lady was dead, and that Mr. ARMITAGE, of the West Cornwall Railway police held an apprehending warrant against the husband who had left this part of the county, he thought it best to go and state his loss to the officer himself, who went to St. Ives, and after diligent investigation found the watch in a drawer, in a house where the suspected party was in the habit of going; but evidence could not be obtained against him sufficient for conviction.

INCENDIARY FIRE - On Saturday night last, some miscreants set fire to a rick of furze belonging to a poor labourer named TRESIDDER, at Tinpit, in Mabe. It raged with great fury until all was destroyed, leaving him without fuel for the remainder of the winter; and as it was erected at the end of his cottage close to the wall, the timber of the roof got ignited, and had not the neighbours extinguished it, the cottage would have been burnt down. A reward is offered, which it is hoped will be the means of bringing the offenders to justice.

SERIOUS ACCIDENT AT DELABOLE QUARRIES - On the 4th instant, whilst a young man, named THOMAS BRIM, who had only been employed at the quarries a few days, was working in the pit, he had his leg completely crushed by a large stone. Mr. KING, surgeon of Camelford, was promptly on the spot, and rendered every assistance. Amputation above the knee being deemed necessary, the thigh was removed the same evening by Mr. PEARCE, surgeon R.N., who, with Mr. King, performed the operation in a most skilful manner. The separation of the limb, was accomplished in forty-five seconds. The poor fellow being under the influence of chloroform, was quite unconscious of the operation. He is doing well.

SERIOUS CHARGE OF CUTTING AND WOUNDING - On Monday last, SILAS LUCAS, a miller, residing at Tregrehan Mills, in the parish of St. Blazey, was charged before Mr. E. COODE, jun., with cutting and stabbing, with intent to do grievous bodily harm to a marine store dealer named HENRY WILSON, of St. Austell, whom he met near Cuddrahouse, on Friday evening last, when returning from St. Austell market, in company with another person. It appeared that Lucas went up to Wilson and commenced pulling him by the ear and his hair, upon which Wilson struck him several blows. Lucas then took a knife from his pocket, and stabbed Wilson in the thigh, inflicting a wound six inches long and an inch deep. A surgeon was called, who dressed the wound, but at present Wilson continues in a precarious state, faint hopes being entertained of his recovery. Lucas was committed to take his trial at the ensuing assizes, bail being accepted for his appearance.

CORONERS' INQUESTS - The following inquest has been held by Mr. JOHN CARLYON, county coroner. - On Saturday last, at Silver Well, in the parish of St. Agnes, on the body of MARY JAMES, aged two and a half years, who died on Thursday evening from the effects of scalds, which she received the previous Tuesday evening, by upsetting on herself a saucepan containing boiling broth, which her mother was preparing for the family's supper. The mother was so alarmed that she did not know exactly how the accident happened; but the handle of the saucepan projected a little, and the probability is that the deceased caught hold of the saucepan to save herself from falling, and fell with the saucepan under the fender. The mother caught her immediately, and stripped off her clothes, but she was very much scalded about the face and neck; and although every attention was paid to her, it was without any avail. Verdict, "accidental death."

The following has been held before Mr. GOOD, county coroner:- At Rilla Mill, in Linkinhorne, on Friday last on the body of GRACE WILLIAMS, wife of JOHN WILLIAMS, a miner. It appears that the deceased died on Thursday morning after a lingering illness extending over a period of more than two years, and during the greater part of that time her husband, it was rumoured, not only neglected to provide her with common necessaries, but was in the habit of coming home at late hours in a beastly state of drunkenness, and it was suspected that her death was accelerated by his treatment. The inquiry was a long one, and the jury was composed of highly respectable men, principally farmers, Mr. DINGLEY, of Knighton, acting as foreman. After hearing the evidence, the jury returned as their verdict:- " That the deceased, Grace Williams, died from natural causes, but the jury are unanimously of opinion that the general conduct of her husband, John Williams, towards his wife has been most unfeeling and unkind, and such as can only receive their severest censure and disapproval; and they request that he be so informed by the coroner and reprimanded accordingly." With this the coroner complies, and reprimanded Williams in terms which met the approval of all present.

The following inquest has been held before Mr. GILBERT HAMLEY, County Coroner. - On Monday last in the parish of Advent, on the body of SAMUEL YABSLEY, aged sixty-four, who was found dead in his bed on the previous morning. Deceased had always bee a robust, healthy man, and on the Saturday was at work as usual, and did not complain of illness during the day. About half-past eight he went to bed. His son-in-law and daughter slept in the same room, and heard nothing of him during the night. In the morning he did not wake at his usual house, and his son-in-law called to him, but received no answer. He went to the bed and found him quite dead; he had been dead several house. Verdict, "died by the visitation of God."

TESTIMONIAL TO CAPT. CHARLES THOMAS, OF DOLCOATH - On Monday last, at the two-monthly meeting of Dolcoath adventurers, a dividend of GBP5 per share was declared; and at the dinner subsequent to the meeting, a service of plate was presented to Capt. Charles Thomas, the able manager of the mine, which presentation had been resolved upon the adventurers about six months ago. The place consisted of a coffee-pot and tea-pot, a sugar basin and cream jug, and a very handsome inkstand, which alone cost GBP18. The articles were manufactured by Messrs. WILLIAMS, of London and Bristol, and were procured through Mr. J. C. LANYON, of Redruth, by whom they were supplied at manufacturers' prices. The cost of the whole was fifty guineas. The articles were of very elegant design, being what is termed "Heraldic Plate," and of superior workmanship. On the inkstand was the following inscription:- "Presented to Captain Charles Thomas by the Lord and Adventurers of Dolcoath Mine, in token of their high estimation of his personal character, and of the successful application of his scientific and practical knowledge as a Miner in the development of the resources of this Mine." The dinner took place in the account-house at two o'clock; and about fifty were present, presided over by Mr. MARRIOTT, as the representative of the lord of the sett, Mr. J. F. BASSET, of Tehidy. The chairman was supported by the committee of management, and by others, the principal shareholders in the mine. The vice-chair was occupied by Captain Charles Thomas.

After a good dinner, to which the company were not slow in doing justice, the cloth was removed, the glasses primed, and the Chairman gave, with appropriate observations, "The health of her Majesty the Queen," and "The Duke of Cornwall and the rest of the Royal Family." These toasts having been duly honoured, the Chairman said the next toast we will drink, if you please, will be the health of the lord of the mine. "Cheers.) The Basset family from time immemorial, have been more closely identified than any other family in the county with the mining interest. To that interest they are perhaps more largely indebted than any other family; and of all the mines with which they have been connected, there is none to which they are so deeply indebted, and with which they have been so long identified and closely associated as Dolcoath. You will therefore all join in drinking health and long life to Mr. Basset. (Loud cheering)

The toast having been warmly received, the Chairman next rose and said:- Gentlemen, I trust you will give me credit for sincerity in saying that I am most earnestly desirous of doing honour to the individual whom we are assembled to honour, and of endeavouring to justify the flattering, though too partial choice you have made in electing me your chairman on this most interesting occasion, (cheers); but when I look around me, and see so many friends present of much longer acquaintance with Captain Charles Thomas, and of much greater familiarity with the pursuit in which he has so greatly distinguished himself, it most painfully brings home to me that to your kindness, and not to my fitness, I am indebted for the occupation of this chair to-day. (Cheers) It will be superfluous in me to occupy much of your time in explaining the reason of our meeting her together. Of course you are aware of it; but it will not be irrelevant to offer a brief statement of our object, and to indulge in some observations by way of commentary on it. Our object then, gentlemen, is to do honour to Captain Charles Thomas; to demonstrate the high sense we entertain of his character as a man, and his ability as a miner; and, not content with a mere favourable expression of that feeling, we are determined to record and perpetuate the memory of it by presenting him with a testimonial of plate. (Loud cheers) Gentlemen, it has been commonly observed that the present is an age of testimonials, and probably most of those who have given utterance to that opinion, have done so more or less sarcastically, and implying some degree of disparagement of gifts of that kind in general. Nor can we much wonder at this when we consider the extraordinary profusion with which they have been showered about of late years; and the ridiculous grounds - I am forced to add the questionable motives, with which they have been got up and presented. But, gentlemen, we all know there is no rule without an exception, and it would be a hard measure to deal out a sweeping censure upon an act honourable and meritorious, simply because it was liable to abuse. I, for one, am very decidedly of opinion, that a testimonial fitly given and fairly earned is as honourable to human nature as it is to the individual who received it (cheers). And what is the feeling, gentlemen, which impels any number of men to present such a gift to another man? It is nothing more or less than the homage a number of men feel constrained to render to conspicuous merit in one of their fellow-creatures. (Cheers) The inherent value, or, in other words, the moral worth of such a testimonial is not to be weighed by ounces, or to be estimated by the number of names appended to a subscription list. Every day's experience will tell us that neither the one mode nor the other will afford any just criterion to the impartial mind of its just value. The only way that I know of arriving at a satisfactory estimate of this kind, is to form a judgment of the character of the man who received the testimonial, and the motives of those who present it. And I am proud to say, that apply this test as searchingly as you will to this testimonial when weighed in the balance it will not be found...........................[missing] -

they may be pleased to consider a continuation of my best services as such. I trust that my children and my children's children for many generations, by looking at these articles, and especially at the inscription, will be prompted to pursue their several providential paths with industry, integrity, and honour of the highest order. Gentlemen, the lords and adventurers of Dolcoath Mine - I sincerely thank you for this and every former act of your great kindness to me. I have often thought, and said too, that no mine agent every had a more comfortable situation than I have in this mine, and that no adventurers of this mine have always treated me. I do not reckon the anxiety and toil of past or present services any discomfort. The knowledge of my services being approved of, and the success which has attended the efforts made, more than compensate for all the labour and anxiety of mind. I beg to take this opportunity of thanking every agent in the mine for the valuable assistance given me in carrying on the various operations on the mine, underground and at surface. We lay no claim to perfection, but it is my decided judgment that it would be a difficult matter to select a better staff for conducting every scientific and practical operation in this mine than those the adventurers of this mine have appointed as my assistance. (Cheers) My personal connection with this mine began in March, 1806, when I was eleven and a half years old, nearly fifty-one years ago. It is forty-two years since I was appointed underground captain, managing captain thirteen years, and just eleven years since you were please to place greater confidence in me still, by entrusting me with the responsibility of purchasing all the materials, subject to the approval of the committee, and of receiving the ore bills and sending them to the bank when endorsed by the committee. I have great pleasure on this interesting occasion to be able to say that I have endeavoured to perform all my duties to the best of my ability for the benefit of the adventurers as a whole; not for the advantage of any one of the disadvantage of the others, (cheers); losing sight of selfish and family interest in all my transactions; feeling bound, from a sense of duty, to serve them who pay me my wages. But for this consciousness of past faithfulness, and present intention to be faithful to my trust, your magnificent present, with all its pleasing accompaniments could not give me the satisfaction I now enjoy.

It is well known to most of you that this mine was for a long period rich in the production of copper ores. I have taken from the cost books the amount credited for ores sold in twenty years, from the year 1803to 1822 inclusive, and find it to be GBP1,416,406. 17s. 1d.; nearly one and a half millions in twenty years. The greatest amount sold in one month was GBP14,119. 13s. 9d., and in one year GBP117,515. 0s. 9d. The three previous preparatory years gave GBP80,614. The total amount during the present working (I have not taken out the whole) must be nearly if not fully three millions. The great master course of copper ore on the main lode was taken away during a former working, which closed in the year 1778 - I would guess that amount to be about two millions, having no means of ascertaining the amount of sales twenty years ago. In the estimation of most persons connected and unconnected with the mine, it was in the deepest part so far exhausted as to render it highly improbable that the produce would ever meet the cost of working. The pumps were accordingly drawn up from the 210 to the 160 fathom level. About the same time the valley - the eastern part of the mine, was crushed together and abandoned. All the marks of dissolution were manifest; the mine was to linger on a few more years, then to die a natural death. It is well known to some of you that this was not my opinion of the bottom of the mine, and that shortly after you appointed me the managing captain you gave authority to commence drawing up the water, and to clear up the valley part of the mine. The bottom of the sump was reached in the middle of the year 1849 - commenced sinking in October in that year - sunk up to this day forty fathoms in seven years and four months. The depth sunk in the sump, from the commencement in 1800 to 1849 was fifty-five fathoms in forty-nine years, on an average somewhat less than seven feet per year, and that, with working the high ground and side lodes gave employment to full 1000 persons, on an average of the forty-nine years. The late sinking of the mine forty fathoms deeper, and the driving of the 210, 220, and 242 fathoms levels, lengths varying from 140 to fourteen fathoms - total on the main lode 470 and on the north part eighty-eight fathoms, resulted in the opening up a substantial tin mine not likely to be soon exhausted, and will doubtless, if properly managed, give employment to large numbers of people for a long period, adding to the wealth of the town of Camborne as well as to that of the adventurers. Hoping that this statement will be interesting to you, I again with all my heart thank you. (Loud and prolonged cheering).

BIRTHS, MARRIAGES, AND DEATHS - The Registrar General's report has been issued for the quarter ending December 31st, 1856, with remarks on the returns for the whole year. The report states that the returns of births for the four quarters of the last year imply that in the country, as well as in the metropolis, the health of the population of England and Wales was better than it was in any of the previous ten years. The effects of sanitary measures are becoming apparent, although they are only partially carried out within limited areas. Out of a thousand persons living, the fall of the annual deaths from the average of twenty-three in the ten years 1846 to 1855, and from less than twenty-three in the year 1855 to less than twenty-one in 1856, is decisive. The births in 1856 exceed the average proportion. The Christmas quarter of the year shows a decrease of deaths and an increase of births. The marriages exhibit a considerable increase in the summer quarter of 1856 on the returns on the summer of 1855.

INCREASE OF POPULATION - As 157,615 births and 96,521 deaths were registered in the last quarter of 1856, the ascertained natural increase of the population in three months was 61,094. In the same period 39,063 emigrants sailed from the ports of the United Kingdom; of whom it was ascertained that 16,962 were of English origin; and allowing for a proportion of 4721 persons of unascertained origin, the English emigrants may be set down at 10,211, the Scotch at 2406, the Irish at 15,467, foreigners at 3240. It is novel to see that the English emigrants exceed the Irish in number, and that for 5897 sailing to the United States, a force of 13,198 embarked for the Australian Colonies. As 657,704 births, and 321,369 deaths were registered in the year 1856, the natural increase of population in England was 266,335. The number of emigrants into England during the year is unknown; the emigrants of English origin amounted to upwards of 70,585. The natural increase of population in the United Kingdom was probably at the rate of 1000 a day.

STATE OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH - The deaths of 95,521 persons were registered in the last quarter of the year 1856; and the rate of mortality in the three months was 20 per 1000 per annum. In the districts comprising the chief towns in which nearly half the population is living, the people died at the rate of 24, while in the remaining districts comprising small towns and country parishes, the death-rate was 17 to 1000. This shows in a strong light how much room there is for improvement in our large towns; for it is well known that many fatal agents which may be arrested are at work in the small towns and country parishes. It is gratifying to find that the public mind is not awakened to the importance of rendering the whole population healthy; and that the salutary results of supplying the people with pure water, of removing the dirt from under the dwellings, and of bringing all the known appliances of hygiology into operation, through the agency of a scientific body of medical health officers, are becoming visible. 391,369 persons died in England and Wales during the year 1856. About 324,000 died by diseases and accidents which are at present almost inevitable. And 67,000 perished by causes which, if they are skilfully attacked, may it is believed either be mitigated or removed. Let us pause to consider for a moment what these five figures mean. Each unit represents a life lost. Many had lived to the ordinary limits of age; but thousands in the throng were children; sons, daughters, sisters, brothers, wives, husbands, fathers, mothers, who had not lived out half their days. These lives have been lost; but happily forty-seven thousand men, women, and children of the same classes are now living who would have been dead had the same rate of mortality prevailed in the year 1856 as prevailed in the ten years 1846-55; and the loss of lives is 34,873 less than it was in the previous year. A certain number of these lives have been saved by sanitary measures.

CORNWALL - The deaths registered in the quarter ending December 31st, 1856, were 1744; in the same quarter of 1855, they were 1701. The births registered in the December quarter of 1856 were 2979; in the December quarter of 1855, 2664.

STANNARIES COURT - JENKIN v. LEE - Wheal Inney Consols. This was a creditor's petition; but in consequence of the illness of a material witness, and other circumstances, Mr. STOKES said it had been arranged between himself and Mr. HOCKIN for defendant, that the case should be referred to the Registrar, to ascertain the amount due from the defendant to the plaintiff, if any; and whether or not the plaintiff during the time of contracting the debt was an adventurer; and if so, what amount of costs of the mine should be set off against his claim. An order of the courts was made to that effect.

FISHER v. WILLINGALE and ANOTHER - Hawkmoor Mine. This was a purser's petition, Willingale owing for costs GBP30. 5s., and DAVIDSON, the other defendant, GBP41. 5s. No answer had been filed by defendants. Mr. Roberts moved on the usual affidavits, and obtained a decree for payment in seven days.

TODD v. DOWLING and OTHERS - Swanpool Mine. A purser's petition to recover from defendants costs in arrear, viz. from DIONYSIUS DOWLING, GBP30. 12s. 6d.; J. R. CHIDLEY, GBP203. 7s.; T. H. DOWLING, GBP15. 5s.; and J. R. POOLE, GBP61. 5s. Mr. HOCKIN said his Honor had granted a decree for payment in ten days after service, on the 28th January. Defendants resided in London, and on affidavits of constructive service and non-payment, he moved for a rule absolute for sale of shares. Rule absolute granted.

GOLDSWORTHY and OTHERS v. VIVIAN. East Rosewarne. This was a creditors' petition against the mine for recovery of GBP70. Mr. PAULL appeared for plaintiffs, and moved for a decree for payment. Mr. STOKES, for defendant, said since the petition was filed, plaintiffs had received GBP24. 12s. 4d. of the debt, and as there was some difference between the parties as to the amount of the debt, he would propose to Mr. Paull to take a decree by consent, subject to a reference to the Registrar as to the amount due. This was agreed to, and a decree for payment granted, subject to a reference to the Registrar.

FISHER v. BISHOP and OTHERS - Calstock United Mines. A purser's petition against Mr. CHARLES BISHOP, residing in London, for payment of GBP42, costs in arrear. No answer had been filed, and on affidavits, Mr. ROBERTS, for plaintiff, obtained a decree for payment in seven days.

TODD v. MOLINSON and OTHERS - Swanpool Mine. A purser's petition for recovery of costs in arrear from ANN MOLINSON, GBP27. 5s.; E. J. TODD, GBP6. 2s. 6d.; and D. W. DOWLING, GBP183. 15s. Defendants live out of the Stannaries. A decree for payment in ten days had been obtained; service had been effected, but payment not made, and on affidavits to that effect, Mr. Hockin moved for a rule absolute for sale of defendants' shares. Granted.

NORTON v. BEST and ANOTHER - East Caradon Mine. This was a purser's petition against the executors of Mr. BENJAMIN BEST, who lives out of the Stannaries. Constructive service of petition having been effected, Mr. ROBERTS, for plaintiff, obtained an order of court to enter an appearance for defendants.

KEY v. ALISON - East Friendship Consols. A creditor's petition for recovery of upwards of GBP90. Mr. HOCKIN said his Honor granted an injunction in November last to restrain the sale of machinery and materials. The debt and costs had been paid, and he now moved, for defendant, on affidavits of himself and defendant's London solicitor, for a rule nisi to dissolve the injunction. Plaintiff's solicitor would not consent to a rule absolute, because he had not received instructions for that purpose. The Vice Warden, on hearing the affidavits, said he would grant a rule absolute to dissolve the injunction.

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 12 - The Court proceeded this morning with the hearing of small debt cases, of which there were thirty-six entered; and the remaining entries were, one action at common law, twenty-one equity causes, and eight motions. SOWDEN v. REDRUTH and CHACEWATER RAILWAY COMPANY - This was a small debt case for recovery of 17s. 6d., the value of a rick of furze which plaintiff alleged had been burnt down on his premises at Carnon Mill, in consequence of being set on fire by a spark from a passing engine of the Redruth and Chacewater Railway Company. The jury, at the last court, when the trial took place, gave a verdict for the plaintiff; but Mr. TILLY, for defendants, subsequently obtained a rule for a new trial, on the ground that the jury had misunderstood the law of the case as laid down to them by the Vice-Warden, and that they had given their verdict against the weight of evidence. The new trial was fixed for these sittings; but to-day Mr. STOKES, on behalf of Mr. Tilly, defendant's solicitor, applied to have the case postponed, stating that Mr. Tilly had unfortunately met with a serious accident, having on the previous morning been thrown from his horse and dislocated his shoulder. It was therefore impossible that he could attend during the present sittings of the court. It was a case involving an important principle, and it was very desirable that Mr. Tilly should be present on the part of the company to conduct it. He (Mr. Stokes) was not in a situation to proceed with the case inasmuch as he had only just received the brief. Mr. Hockin, on the part of plaintiff, said he had every desire to accommodate Mr. Tilly, so far as he was personally concerned, but he was obliged to consult the interests of his client, and his client was strongly opposed to the adjournment, inasmuch as he was put to expense by the attendance of witnesses, for whose attendance, even if defendant paid the costs of the day, the rules appertaining to small debt plaints allowed but small remuneration. Mr. Stokes said he would undertake, on the part of Mr. Tilly and his clients, to pay any fair and reasonable compensation for the attendance of witnesses even beyond the small debt scale, if that were required. After such further observations, the Vice-Warden order the case to stand over till the next sittings; it being arranged that if any difference arose between the parties as to the costs to be paid for witnesses' attendance, the Registrar should take the opinion of his Honor on the subject.

MOYLE v. STEPHENS - This was a small debt suit, by Capt. JOHN MOYLE, of Gwennap, to recover damages from Mr. SAMPSON STEPHENS, of Penryn, wine and spirit merchant, on account of a collision between defendant's waggon and plaintiff's gig. Mr. TILLY was the attorney for plaintiff, and Mr. STOKES for defendant. This case also was postponed, by consent of the parties, until the next sittings, in consequence of Mr. Tilly's accident.


20 february 1857, Friday


STEAM FROM LONDON TO MELBORNE DIRECT. PARCELS FOR AUSTRALIA - The Australian Auxiliary Steam Clipper Company, limited, will dispatch their first-class powerful Screw Steam-ship "King Philip," 2300 Tons, CHARLES HENRY CARY, Commander, from London on the 25th, and Plymouth on the 31st of March. Parties desirous of sending small parcels to their friends in the Colonies will find this the best opportunity, as the Company undertake the safe delivery of all packages to their Agents at Melbourne. N.B.- This magnificent vessel has unrivalled accommodation for all classes of passengers. Rates of Passage Money. After-Saloon, from Fifty Guineas each; Second Cabin Passengers, from Sixteen to Thirty-five Guineas each.

NOTICE - All persons indebted to the late Mr. ROBERT ALLEN, of Falmouth, Brewer, deceased, are requested to pay their respective accounts to Mrs. ANN ALLEN, or Mr. JOHN TRIGGS, at the Brewery, Falmouth; to whom the particulars of all claims on the deceased should be forwarded. Falmouth, February 11th, 1857.

LOCAL INTELLIGENCE - UNDER SHERIFF - The High Sheriff of Cornwall, Sir HENRY ONSLOW, of Hengar, Bart., has appointed Mr. COPLESTONE RADCLIFFE, solicitor, Plymouth, Under Sheriff for the ensuing year.

SECOND REGIMENT OF CORNWALL RIFLES - We understand that Sir J. S. TRELAWNY, Bart. Resigned his commission in the second Regiment of Cornwall Rifles, some weeks since.

COAST GUARD - Commander J. N. T. SAULEZ, R.N., has been removed from the Gosport station and appointed to Falmouth, vice commander B. A. WAKE, R.N., whose period of service has expired.

RECEIVER OF WRECKS - Mr. WILLIAM HENRY HOLMES, Collector of Customs at Penzance, has been appointed by the Board of Trade (with the consent of the Lords of the Treasury) receiver of wrecks for the Penzance district, extending from Lizard Point westward, to the western-most point of land on the south part of the Land's-end, and from thence northward to the Brisons Rock, in the room of Mr. RICHARD PEARCE.

CHRISTMAS EXAMINATIONS - Mr. J. RICHARDS, lately pupil teacher in the Redruth National School, at an examination before one of H.M. Inspectors for Training Colleges, obtained a second-class certificate, which entitles him during the ensuing year, to board and education, free, at Culham Training Institution, as well as six pounds for his own use.

COALS FOR THE POOR - Mr. H. HUSSEY VIVIAN, M.P., with his usual liberality, has distributed to the poor of Truro, five hundred bushels of coal of one cwt.

DEATH OF CAPTAIN GICHARD - This veteran officer, who was a native of Cornwall, after severe and protracted suffering arising from wounds received whilst in the service of his country, died on the 30th ultimo, at Exeter, in the 73rd year of his age. He served with the 4th King's Own at the capture of Copenhagen in 1807, on the expedition to Sweden in 1808, and subsequently to Portugal under Sir JOHN MOORE, including the advance into Spain, retreat to and battle of Corunna, expedition to Walcheren in 1809, Peninsular campaigns of 1812, 1813 and 1814, including the reduction of the forts at Salamanca, Battle of Salamanca, capture of Madrid, siege Burgos, action at Villa Muriel, (slightly wounded), battle of Vittoria siege and capture of San Sebastian, attack upon the heights after crossing the Bidassoa, battles of Nivelle and Nive, in which latter he was severely wounded in the left thigh by a musket shot. He had received the war medal with six clasps.

REDRUTH COUNTY COURT - On the second day of these sittings, in a case arising out of a public house score, his Honor declared his intention to be to discourage the keepers of beer-shops from permitting working-men to get into debt to an amount so manifestly beyond their means of paying, and that in future he should order such scores to be paid in instalments of sixpence per month, or some small amount of that sort. In the case of a debt claimed by an itinerant vendor of drapery, his Honor commented strongly on the system of worrying poor people into taking goods which they were not able to pay for, and he desired publicly to express his disapprobation of such a course, and his desire to discourage it. The Judge was obliged to leave the court for about half-an-hour in consequence of indisposition.

On his return, the case CHEGWIN v. J. NICHOLL having been called on, the plaintiff asked for adjournment, on the ground that Mr. TILLY, who was to have conducted his case, had been thrown from his horse and very seriously hurt. Case adjourned, the costs to abide future decision.

In the case of TILLY v. TIPPET and others, the plaintiff claimed GBP13 money advanced, and goods supplied to the defendants while working in Wheal Seton. The defendants had been unsuccessful tributers, and, in consideration of their having been so, the purser had advanced them a sum of money, on the receipt of which the men had left the mine and had ever since refused either to pay the money or to work it up. Judgment was given for the full amount, to be paid forthwith.

BODMIN COUNTY COURT - At the recent sittings of this court, we stated that an action for recovery of GBP50, on a dishonoured bill of exchange, had been brought by Mr. THOMAS SARGENT, of Liskeard, against Capt. JOHN SEYMOUR, of Polscoe, near Lostwithiel. Capt. Seymour writes us this week a long explanation of the matter, to show that he was not the actual drawer of the bill, but that the debt was incurred through some mining transactions between him and Mr. Sargent, and that he (Capt. Seymour) is really not indebted. The verdict was for defendant at the County Court, on the ground that the notice of dishonour was insufficient.

EXETER DISTRICT COURT OF BANKRUPTCY - At the Court of Bankruptcy, on Tuesday, the 10th instant, before Mr. Commissioner BERO, Mr. WILLIAM NORTHEY, lime burner, of Lifton, was chosen assignee in the case of WILLIAM BURT, builder, St. Stephens by Launceston.

PORT OF TRURO, ANCHORAGE DUES - At Devoran, on Friday last, Capt. DAVIS, master of the "Secret," of Llanelly, refused to pay the anchorage dues, which are 2s. on all over-sea vessels either British or Foreign, and 6d. for all coasters. The "Secret" having come from France was liable to pay 2s., but on the toll being demanded, the captain tendered 6d., and refused to pay any more. Thereupon Mr. PERCY, the lessee of the dues, got the water bailiff and a policeman to distrain on the goods and chattels of the vessel. The bailiff boarded in the usual manner with the silver oar as his authority, and commenced taking an inventory when the captain paid the expenses amounting to GBP2. 7s. 10d.

CHILD DROPPING - At Pool, on the evening of Sunday last, about nine o'clock, as two persons named ANGOVE were passing through a garden adjoining their house, they hear a noise in a privy near them like the crying of a child. On getting a light and examining the place, they found a fine newly-born female child partly dressed and part of the body lying on an old piece of woollen, but the head was on the cold stone. They took it up, had it nursed and dressed, and on Monday morning took it to the workhouse. The inhuman mother has not yet been discovered.

DESERTION OF A CHILD - We stated about a fortnight ago, that an infant had been placed in the Truro union-house under the following circumstances. A young woman who said her name was MARY JANE JORY called with a married woman named BENNETTS, on the relieving officer, Mr. RICKARD, at Truro, the young woman's statement being that she had been on a visit to her sister at Penzance, and on returning to Truro by the last train at night, a tall respectable-looking female who had a child in the railway carriage, asked her when they arrived at the Truro station to hold the child whilst she got out; that she did so, and the woman made off, and left the child with her; that she took it into Truro, wandered about the streets some time, and then met with Mrs. Bennetts, of Calenick-street, who kindly gave her shelter for the night. The young woman said she was the daughter of a carpenter named Jory, living at Probus. The relieving officer had no reason to doubt her statement, Mrs. Bennetts being present to confirm some part of it, and consequently he made an order for the admission of the child to the union-house. The relieving officer, however, sent the parties to Mr. NASH, police superintendent, who took from the young woman a description of the woman who had tricked her at the railway station, &c.

An account of the matter appeared in the West Briton, and was read by Mr. Jory, of Probus, the carpenter, whose son came to the Truro Police Station, and satisfactorily showed that none of his family were concerned in the affair; and it now turns out that the whole was a fabrication as to the name of the young woman and the trick at the railway station. The poor-law guardians employed Mr. Nash to endeavour to trace the parties concerned. He went to Probus and Grampound and made inquiries, the result of which induced him next to go to the neighbourhood of Chacewater and Blackwater, where he and police-constable WOOLCOCK ascertained that there was a young woman of the description given them, residing in that neighbourhood. Two brothers' families of the name of BAWDEN lived in adjoining houses; one brother was dead, and the house was occupied by his widow and family. Whilst Mr. Nash was asking the widow some questions, her son went out to a neighbouring house, and just afterwards, police-constable Woolcock saw a young woman come out of the house and go into a field. He followed, and found her concealed behind a hedge, and brought her into the widow's (her mother's) house, where she admitted that she was the mother of the child which was brought to Truro on the 29th of January, and was then in the union-house; that it was her sister, SALLY BAWDEN, who took the child to Truro, and that Mrs. Bennetts was a confederate of hers, having been at her house previous to the confinement, and that she received three shillings for her trouble in taking the child to the union. It appears that Mrs. Bennetts, when the order was received from the relieving officer, carried the child into the union-house, the young woman (Sally Bawden) remaining out in the road. There was no deception at the railway station, nor was the child brought to Truro on the night the woman stated to the relieving officer, but the next morning. On Monday last, the mother of the child, ELIZABETH BAWDEN, was taken before Dr. CARLYON, county magistrate, at Truro, and committed for two months to hard labour in the house of correction at Bodmin. Mrs. Bennetts (who is the wife of a man that collects marine stores, and sells earthenware from a donkey cart) was discharged from custody. The surgeon states that the infant was only twenty-four hours old when it was brought to Truro; on Saturday last, the child died in the Union-house.

TRURO POLICE - On Thursday the 12th instant, before the Mayor, and Mr. CHAPPEL and Mr. PADDON, magistrates, FRANCIS GRAY, beershop-keeper, Kenwyn-street, was charged with having his house open for the sale of beer and porter at a quarter past four on the morning of the 7th instant. He pleaded guilty, and was fined 10s. and costs, it being the second conviction.

EDWARD CLIFT and CHARLES PASCOE were fined 5s. and costs for being drunk in Church-lane on Sunday forenoon the 8th instant.

On Monday, WILLIAM GOUGH and MARY ANN GOUGH, two travelling vagrants, were committed for twenty-one days to hard labour, for begging and annoying the inhabitants.

On Tuesday last MARY ALLEN, wife of JOSEPH ALLEN, living in Thomas's Court, St. Clement-street, was charged with committing an aggravated assault on a child about four years of age, left in her care by the mother, who went to London a few months ago. The neighbours had often heard the child bitterly crying, as if greatly ill-treated, and they gave information to the police, and on Mr. NASH, police superintendent, going to the house, and examining the child, whose name is MARY JANE DAW, he found she was almost covered with marks and bruises from the neck to the feet, and presented a most pitiable spectacle. Two of the neighbours gave evidence before the magistrates, one of them stating that she had seen Allen beating the child with a cane as she was lying on the floor almost in a state of nudity. The woman stated the reason of her beating the child, and said she did not think she had corrected her more than was necessary. She was fined 2s. 6d., with 5s. 6d. costs, or in default one month's imprisonment.

PENZANCE POLICE - On Tuesday last, ALICE JANE RUNNALLS, bar-maid in the employ of Mr. BALL, of the Union Hotel, was charged before the magistrates with stealing 13s. 6d., the property of her master. She took the opportunity, whilst Mrs. Ball was absent from the bar, of going to the desk, taking a key from a drawer in it, and then unlocking the desk, from which she took the money and put it in her pocket. The act was witnessed by a servant to Mr. F. BOASE, she being in the bar at the time waiting to be served with ale. On going out of the bar she informed "boots" of what she had seen, and Mr. and Mrs. Ball being made acquainted with the act, the barmaid was questioned, and produced the money from her pocket. Mrs. Ball had previously missed money from the till. She was given into custody, and pleading guilty to the charge, she was summarily convicted, and sentenced to three months' imprisonment with lard labour.

FALMOUTH POLICE - At the Guildhall, on the 10th inst., before Mr. CARNE, and Mr. BROAD, magistrates, JOHN STORER, innkeeper, was called on to answer for harbouring women of bad character in his house. It was stated that the persons complained of were in the tap-room, which is under-let. The magistrates, however, decided that the case was proved, and find defendant 40s. and expenses.

JOHN JACKETT, a marine store dealer, was summoned for not entering in his book the goods bought by him, according to law. Mr. GENN watched the case for defendant. Policeman PRATER stated that he went to Jackett's stores on the 3rd of February, and inquired if he had bought certain rope or junk. Jackett named some lots and said that was all he had bought; but at last when the policeman asked if he had bought any from a man named HAWKE, he said yes and pointed it out. Superintendent JULYAN went to the captain of the ship "Columbus," who had lost a quantity of rope, but he refused to prosecute or own any of it. On defendant's book being examined, it was found to contain entries up to the 30th, (Friday) but nothing for the Saturday, when the three cwt. alluded to was bought. RICHARD HAWKE was then sworn, who stated that he belonged to Truro, and that on the 31st ult. he sold to Jackett 3 cwt. 1 qr. And 4 lbs of junk, a small quantity of rags, and 3 lbs. of brass, and for the whole he was paid GBP1. 7s 6d. The witness was cross-examined by Mr. Genn, and said he saw no book or slate in the store to enter the goods in; defendant put down what he was going to pay for in chalk on a board, but with no name. He told the policeman he had sold the junk to jacket, and that he kept no book as dealers did at Truro. Mr. Genn addressed the bench, submitting that the charge had not been proved, and that Hawke had informed to try to get the fine, or a part of it. He then called the defendant, Jackett, who stated that he had entered in his book his purchases up to the Friday, and that the Saturday work was on a slate, and that he always kept his book at the dwelling house, and sometimes entered in two or three days together. The book was produced and he offered to get the slate. The magistrates consulted together, and then said they considered the offence had been proved, as the Act of Parliament clearly stated that the entries must be in a book or books, and that to use a slate was not sufficient. They hoped it would be a lesson to the defendant and to others to be more particular; they should only fine him 10s. and the expenses; and they said that in a port like Falmouth the dealers in marine stores should be cautious with regard to purchasing of persons not known to them.

The next charge was against WILLIAM NEWMAN, a beershop-keeper on the Back Hill. Police constable PRATER went with a captain of a shop to look for some seamen, and on searching Newman's rooms, he found in one of them a sailor and a girl of bad character, who attempted to conceal herself. Defendant was fined 20s. and costs, and received a caution from the magistrates against allowing such characters to frequent his house.

STANNARIES COURT - Tuesday, February 17. - NOELL v. WYNNE - Mr. STOKES, on the question of costs in this case, said he understood the court had decided that the costs of the issue were to be paid by both parties. He referred to the circumstances under which the issue was tried, and the verdict having been in favour of the plaintiff on that issue, he asked the court to reconsider the point as to costs, submitting that the costs of the issue should be allowed to plaintiff as a set-off against the general costs of the case, which plaintiff would have to pay, as the ultimate decision was against him. Mr. ROBERTS having been heard on the other side, the Vice-Warden said he would reconsider the case.

CHESTON and ANOTHER v. RICHARDS and ANOTHER - Clowance Wood Mine - This was also a question as to costs. The decision of the case was in favour of plaintiffs, as we have before reported, but the Vice Warden reserved the question of costs for further consideration. Mr. ROBERTS, for the plaintiffs, submitted that there was nothing in the case to vary the general rule, that costs should follow the result. He reviewed various points of the evidence, and contended that plaintiffs were entitled to the costs of the suit as against the defendant Richards, inasmuch as his conduct was the primary cause of all the litigation that had taken place; and that defendant ST. AUBYN had also incurred liability to costs, the facts as to the waiver of covenant, and the general allegations of the petition, having been denied in his answer, rendering it necessary that plaintiffs should be prepared with evidence of those facts. The Vice-Warden said he considered there was not the least personal imputation against Mr. St. Aubyn, who had acted in the same manner as probably any other gentleman would have done under the circumstances. When applied to on the subject of the revocation, he wrote as proper a letter as possible, intimating that he was acting under the advice of his agents. With regard to the agents, he thought if Messrs. GRYLLS and HILL had known what afterwards came out in court, they would not have granted the sett to defendant Richards. He conceived that Messrs. Grylls and Hills had no personal knowledge of the receipt of dues when they drew the deed of revocation; if they had such knowledge, they would have drawn the revocation in a different form. The dues, however, having been received by a person authorised to receive them, Mr. St. Aubyn was subject to the legal consequences.

Mr. HOCKIN addressed the court on the part of Mr. St. Aubyn, and having reviewed the dates connected with the granting of the sett, he said the position Messrs. Grylls and Hills at length found themselves in was this. If Captain Richards's statement made to them was the correct one, they were bound to grant him the sett, having previously given him a written promise on the part of Mr. St. Aubyn, and sent him a draft of the sett for approval. On the other hand, if Messrs. Grylls and Hill believed Mr. CARDOZO's statement to be the correct one, they were bound not to grant the sett to defendant Richards. They had information from the toller that the sett had not been properly worked for the last eighteen months, and they therefore reasonably concluded in favour of Capt. Richards's representations. He agreed with Mr. Roberts that defendant Richards was the original cause of the litigation, and he submitted that Mr. St. Aubyn should not be required to pay the costs, at least not exclusively. Mr. Stokes, on the part of Captain Thomas Richards, contended that his client had acted in a perfectly bona fide and straightforward manner, though he might have been a little more prudent in sooner getting rid of his unpaid agency before he applied for the sett. But he believed the old company were totally unable to go on, and there was no moral imputation to be cast on his conduct. He offered some of his old friends of the former company shares in the new concern, and made a similar communication ultimately to Mr. Cardozo. He (Mr. Stokes) was perfectly content to leave the question of costs in the hands of his Honor. The Vice-Warden said he would give his decision as to costs on as early a day as possible.

MARTYN v. BENNETT - Pentireglaze Mine. This was a creditor's petition by Mr. Martyn, of Wadebridge, for recovery of GBP245. 8s. 5d. due to him by the adventurers of this mine. Mr. HOCKIN moved for, and Mr. ROBERTS, on the part of defendant consented to, a decree for payment in a month. - Granted.

MILLETT and ANOTHER v. ANGOVE - Wheal Nelson, in Camborne parish. Mr. HOCKIN said this was a creditor's petition for recovery of a debt amounting to GBP704. 7s. A decree for payment was granted on the 8th of January last, and on affidavits of personal service on defendant, representing the adventurers, and non-payment of the debt, he moved for a rule absolute for sale of machinery and materials. Rule absolute granted.

On Wednesday the court again sat, when the only case for consideration was that of RULE v. HANDCOCK, a small debt plaint, in which there had been an irregularity in the service of the summons, a summons having been served which had not been issued by the court. The Vice-Warden called upon the attorney engaged for plaintiff, Mr. FORFAR, to explain the matter; and in addition to an affidavit by the bailiff, Mr. Forfar gave an explanation of the way in which the mistake occurred. The Vice-Warden said the bailiff should also have been present to have been interrogated. Under the circumstances he should set aside the judgment which had been given in the case, and stay execution; the plaintiff might again proceed if he thought proper.

PARISH OF HELLAND - Helland is in the Hundred of Trigg, and lies about two miles and half from the town, and forming a portion of the parliamentary borough of Bodmin, its post town. The living is a rectory in the gift of the MOORSHEAD family of Lavethan. The tithes are commuted at GBP212. 10s.; in 1294, they were valued at 40s. The population in 1801 - 221, 1811 - 223, 1821 - 264, 1831 - 285, 1841 - 300, 1851 - 252. The church is a small and rather plain building, dedicated to St. Helena the mother of Constantine, whence the name of the parish. The tower is low and very much like a pigeon-house. It contains but one bell, and there is no means of access to the top of it. In the church windows are some remnants of painted glass and two or three coats of arms. On the floor adjoining the chancel door is a slate tomb, on which are the arms of Calwodley impaled with those of Carminnow. In the centre is the effigy of a man, and around the border was once an inscription now wholly defaced; the following portion of it, however, has been preserved:- "You saints pray for the soule of WILLIAM CALWODLEY, sonne and heire of ----CALWODLEY." On the tablets affixed to the walls are the following inscriptions:- "To the memory of ELIZABETH wife of JOHN HOOPER, of Penhargard, in this parish, who died February 6th, 1839, in her 54th year. Although a long and severe sufferer, she bore her affliction with patience and exemplary Christian fortitude. As a wife few exceeded her in worth, and as a mother she was tender and affectionate. This tablet is erected as the last testimony of affection by her bereaved and sorrowing husband and children."

Sacred to the memory of the Rev. FRANCIS JOHN HEXT, A.M., of Tredethy, twenty-five years rector of this parish, who died at Bath, 27th January, 1841, aged sixty-two years. Virtuous and upright he earnestly endeavoured, with true Christian charity, to do good to all around him."

"Sacred to the memory of JAMES SANDYS, infant son of Captain G.B. KEMPTHORNE, I.N., and CHARLOTTE LOUISA his wife, who died at Aden on the 19th January, 1843, aged nine months. His affectionate parents, in fond remembrance of his Heaven-loved innocence, erect this monument to his memory in humble gratitude for the glorious assurance that, 'of such is the kingdom of God.' "

The clergyman's residence has been rebuilt by the present rector, on a new site, on a tasteful and commodious [p]lan,

The following list of rectors is from the Cornwall Register of the Rev. Mr. WALLIS, an excellent and truthful book so far as it goes. 1662, HELE; 1682, WAKEHAM; 1732, WILLIAMS; 1778, GILBERT; 1817, HEXT: 1842, the Rev. Mr. GLENCROSS, the present incumbent, to whose urbane and gentlemanly kindness we gratefully bear testimony.

The principal villages in the parish are Bodwen and Helland Bridge, the latter, a place of some little importance, as one of the stations of the Bodmin and Wadebridge Railway. The manor of Helland once belonged to the family of SERGEUX, in 1427 through a co-heiress to Sir JOHN PASSELE, and in 1466, to OTO COLYN.

The manor of Penhargard, forfeited to the crown by the attainder of Sir ROBERT TRESILLIAN, Chief Justice of the King's Bench, in the reign of Richard II., was then granted to Sir HUMPHRY STAFFORD.

The barton of Penhargard was a seat of the OPIES, and in 1657 was sold by THOMAS OPIE to THOMAS HOBLYN, whose grand-daughter carried it in marriage to SAMUEL PETER, whose family sold it to Mr. JOHN HOOPER, the present proprietor, by whose brother-in-law, Mr. NICHOLL, it is now occupied and farmed. In a wood near the river Camel and adjoining the estate is an earthwork, in good preservation, called Penhargard castle.

Boconnion, the pleasant and well-built residence of G. W. PYE, Esq., once belonged to Doctor ROBERT HEART. The estate as well as the adjoining lands is carefully farmed by the proprietor, to whose frank generosity and family of handsome daughters, we are bound to pay a tribute of respect.

The barton Brodes or Broads, was formerly possessed by a family of that name. Subsequent to the reign of James the first, it was the seat of the GLYNNS. In 1711, ROBERT GLYNN, Esq., settled this barton, with other property, on LUCY CLOBERRY, on his marriage with her. Their issue was the celebrated and eccentric Dr. Glynn, who took the additional name of CLOBERRY. He gave Broads on his death in 1800, to the Rev. JOHN HENRY JACOB, of King's College, Cambridge, who sold it the next year to Mr. T. HAWKEN, of whose representatives it was bought by Mr. THOMAS LOWRY, the present proprietor and recent occupier.

At Clerkenwater is an old established woollen manufactory, now belonging to Mr. JOHN HAWKE of Bodmin, under whose personal superintendence the manufactory of blankets, blanketings and serges has attained to a considerable degree of perfection.

Helland is an arable parish, and the lands are generally well cultivated.

STANNARIES COURT - continued Friday, February 19. - TANNAHILL v. MICHELL and HEARD - This was an action at common law, Mr. CHILCOTT and Mr. PAULL appearing for the plaintiff; Mr. STOKES and Mr. HOCKIN for the defendants. The plaintiff, Mr. JAMES TANNAHILL, is a tea-dealer, &c., at Truro; and the defendants, Mr. EDWARD MICHELL and Mr. EDWARD HEARD, were sued as members of and representing the Truro Shipping Company, the action being in fact against that company. Mr. PAULL opened the pleadings, which stated that plaintiff had caused to be delivered to defendants certain goods, namely, three whole chests of tea and six half chests, to be conveyed to Truro in defendants' ship called the "Mary," and there to be delivered to plaintiff. That defendants received the goods, but that although the vessel arrived at Truro, and they delivered to plaintiff one whole chest and two half chests, yet they did not deliver the remainder, though not prevented by damages of the sea, the Queen's enemies, or the act of God. The value of the two whole chests and four half-chests not delivered was GBP56. 16s. 2d., and including interest, and the inconvenience, annoyance, and loss of profits, plaintiff had suffered, the damages claimed by the declaration were laid at GBP100. Defendants pleaded, first, that they were not guilty; secondly, that the contract was not as stated by plaintiff; and on these please issue was joined. Mr. Chilcott then stated the circumstances of the case, and cited from legal authorities with reference to the responsibility of carriers for the safe delivery of goods, contending that when goods were conveyed in a coasting vessel such as the "Mary," from one port to another, it was the duty of those who conveyed the goods, either to deliver them personally, on the arrival of the vessel at the port, to the consignees; or to send notice to the consignees, that they might come and take them from the vessel. Neither of these obligations had been fulfilled by the Truro Shipping Company, in regard to the plaintiff, who having lost his goods through their negligence, now brought this action to recover compensation in damages. The plaintiff, Mr. JAMES TANNAHILL, was then called, and stated he had carried on business in Truro nearly twenty years, and occasionally had had goods from London by the Truro Shipping Company's vessels. In 1855, he purchased of Messrs. Peek of London, three chests and six half-chests of tea. He paid them for the teas, which were then put in bond. In January 1856 he paid the duty, and requested Messrs. Peek to send him the teas. He received the clearing invoice from Messrs. Peek; but had no notice subsequently from the Truro Shipping Company, or their agent Mr. HITCHINS, that the teas had arrived. (Mr. Chilcott said defendants had agreed to admit the teas were received on board.) The "manifest" was here put in as evidence; it was headed as follows:- "Manifest of goods shipped on board the "Mary," J. HENWOOD, for Truro, from Topping's Wharf, London." In the Manifest there were marked of tea packages, nine for J. Tannahill, six for J. Thomas, and two for J. B. Thomas, all of Truro. Witness said, in the latter part of February, he believed about the 29th, he received a portion of the teas.

OSBORNE and another of the town porters brought to his house one chest the first day and two half-chests the second. The town porters had invariably brought the goods to him on previous occasions. (It was explained that the town porters are licensed and sworn porters appointed by the Truro Improvement Commissioners under a local act of Parliament). When the porters brought the half-chests the second day, they seemed to be waiting for payment, and plaintiff told them they had more to bring. They said there was no more down there, the vessel was discharged. He seemed a little puzzled, and they said, "O they will come by the next vessel." It had happened before, that if witness had not received all he expected by one vessel, the remainder had come by a subsequent vessel. He allowed some time to elapse, and then made inquiries, and found that two traders had since arrived, discharged, and gone. He waited perhaps a month, but could not speak positively as to the time. He went to the quay to see Mr. Hitchins, who was not there. About a week after that - he believed it was not more than five weeks after the arrival of the "Mary," he saw Mr. Hitchins, and told him the teas he expected by the "Mary" had not been delivered, and he understood two vessels had since arrived and discharged. Hitchins replied, "you had all that was in the manifest for you." Witness requested him to examine the manifest again, as he was sure there was some mistake; he told him he ought to have had nine packages; the invoice showed that; it did not state the ship, but said, "by first vessel to Truro." Witness then wrote to Messrs. Peek to make inquiries. Hitchins did not call upon witness. He called at Hitchins's house, saw his daughter and left a message. About a week after he met Hitchins's son who acts with his father for the Shipping Company at the quay, and told him he had had a reply from Messrs. Peek, who said the teas were sent down as invoiced. He desired him to make inquiries about them, and showed him the invoice at his office. He did not remember Hitchins calling upon him after that. On several occasions after that, he saw Hitchins, and urged him to make an immediate search about the matter. At one or two of those interviews, Hitchins, again told witness he had had all that was on the manifest for him; and witness then wrote to Peek's people, who said they had been to the wharfinger, and he said the teas had been shipped in the "Mary" on the 5th of February, and his advice was that witness should hand in the amount of deficiency to Hitchins and sue him for it. Witness always told Hitchins he was responsible, but being a neighbour he did not wish to go to law about it. Hitchins never said anything to imply he was not responsible, but thanked witness for his kindness and forbearance. Witness went on to describe further interviews he had had with Hitchins. On one occasion he told him he had received a small note sent through Messrs. Peek from the wharfinger in London, stating the teas shipped for Mr. J. THOMAS and Mr. J. B. THOMAS, and suggesting that there might be some mistake. About a week after, Hitchins said he had received a letter from the wharfinger, and he said, "I find your teas must have been sent to JOSEPH THOMAS." Witness thought that was in the early part of June. From that time he was frequently making inquiries, as he lived near Hitchins and often saw him. When Hitchins said he had had a letter from the wharfinger, he said, I will make inquiry directly and call and let you know. He never called, but I met him again, and he said Thomas has got your teas. I said I am very glad you have found them; be so kind as to have them sent up at once, as I am really in want of them. He said he would do so. Some time after that, when I met him he said, he remembered that he said to Thomas's man when he was putting them in the cart, "now remember your master has more teas than are in the manifest for him, and see there is no trouble about the paying for them." Witness supposed he meant paying the carriage from London. When witness requested Hitchins to send up the teas, he said "I will go and see about it at once." Witness waited about a week, being called out of town on business in the meantime, and then finding no teas were sent to him, and that Hitchins did not call, he went to Joseph Thomas's to ask if Hitchins had been there. Mr. Thomas said he had been there. I afterwards saw Hitchins and asked him why the teas had not been sent up as he had promised. He replied something about Mr. Thomas having more in bond than he expected, but I did not understand his explanation. I said, I cannot remain quietly under it any longer, I must take means for recovery. Hitchins said he did not know what to say about it.

Before going to any lawyer, some of my friends advised me to see some of the company. I went to Mr. PARKYN as being a shareholder, and he referred me to Mr. EDWARD HEARD as taking an active interest in the affairs of the company. I went to him, and he seemed quite surprised that such a thing should have occurred so long back and the company have never heard of it. He then requested me not to put it in the hands of a lawyer at once, but to wait till the committee met, of which he would give me notice, and I should make my statement to them. I think it was a fortnight after that the meeting was held, sometime in September. At that meeting I made the statement I have here. Hitchins was present, and produced a book to the committee showing how more teas had been delivered to Joseph Thomas then he ought to have had, and less to myself. And they requested me not to move in the matter until they should call another meeting, at which they would desire Thomas to be present with Hitchins and myself. I consented to wait till the second meeting; there I saw Hitchins again, and made my statement again. I mentioned at both meetings that when I spoke to Hitchins about it first, he said I had all that was in the manifest. He did not deny it; he only disputed the time that had elapsed; he thought the time was longer than I stated. They seemed to express some surprise that the matter had not been brought before them before; they laid some degree of blame to their agent. Thomas was present, and some rather unpleasant expressions passed between Thomas and some members of the committee.

The Vice-Warden - Did Thomas say he had received more than should come to him? Witness - No, he never admitted that; he denied it at the meeting. Some of the committee said something about it, and he said they had better go and try it at Wells. (laughter.) After Mr. Thomas had left the room and the chairman had left his seat, one of the members rose and said, "Well, Mr. Tannahill, this is rather a serious matter, and the sooner you look into it the better; of course you know the company are not responsible after the goods are on the quay." I said that is rather a new view of the subject after all we have been talking about, and I declined to express any opinion upon it. This gentleman said, "that is the opinion of the committee, and of course you must go and endeavour to find your teas, I think it is pretty clear where they are gone." Upon that I said, "Well, I give no opinion upon that matter, it is not for me to go into that, but I know now the course I will pursue is just what I ought to have done at first." This was in the latter part of September I think. The value of the teas I lost was GBP56. 16s. 2d. The want of the teas has been of considerable inconvenience to me. I have had to replace them; I don't know at much higher price, but not of such good quality. On Cross-Examination witness said, during many years he had had goods by the company's vessels, but not very often; they had always been brought to him by the public porters, and without notice of the arrivals of the vessels. Two of the small boxes he received from the "Mary" had his name "J. Tannahill" on the cover; the cover of the third box was not lost. Witness further said, after the committee meeting I went into Mr. Joseph Thomas's warehouse. He had said in my hearing at the second committee meeting, the teas were not brought to his warehouse that he was aware of. I said, when Hitchins called, did you look into your invoice and compare it with your stock? He said "no, I copied the numbers of the chests in the invoice, and gave them to Hitchins, without comparing with the stock." I said, "that is not a correct test." I went to Thomas the next day and said, from what he had stated at the meeting, he had not examined, and it was just possible he might have not more than he ought. He said, no, he was sure he had not. I said before the matter goes any further, we may as well go and examine it ourselves. I said, you know your marks and can see in a moment if you have any others. After that he went up into the stores, and I went with him. I saw no chests there with my numbers. I saw one of the same lot of teas, and said that is one of them; we looked at the number and found it corresponded with his own invoice. (Mr. Chilcott explained that when teas are imported from abroad, the authorities at the Custom-house cut a number on each chest or box, which numbers are noted in the invoice which merchants send to purchasers; but the ship's manifest does not contain those numbers, but merely a list of the goods sent and consignees' names.) Witness said, Mr. Thomas said something in the store-room about his having one box over, but that was a matter between him and his neighbour, Mr. J. B. Thomas. Witness admitted that he might have said to Mr. Hitchins something about his own remissness, but he never said anything to him about sharing the loss with the company. At the close of the second committee meeting, after the chairman had left the room, Mr. WILLIAM CLYMA made the statement witness had mentioned, that the committee considered their responsibility ceased with the landing on the quay. Hitchins told witness the wharfinger in London had written to him that the chests were addressed with the initial "I. T." and that the mistake might have occurred in that way. (The reference here was to the initials being the same, namely I. T. for James Tannahill and Joseph Thomas.) The ships of the company arrive now about once a fortnight; he had known them arrive only in five or six weeks; that was one reason why he left the matter about five weeks before he spoke to Hitchins. Before this occurred he was not aware the ships now made quicker passages; he had never missed anything before.

Other witnesses were called in support of plaintiff's case. JOHN ALDERSON, clerk to Messes. PEEK, addressed the tea packages sent by the "Mary". SAMUEL HARVEY, collector of quay dues at Truro. WILLIAM OSBORNE, one of the town porters at the time the "Mary" arrived. (William Osborne, who is now town crier, the Vice-Warden said, gave his evidence in a creditable manner.)WILLIAM ISAAC, in the employ of the Truro Shipping Company.

This concluded plaintiff's case, and Mr. Stokes on the part of defendants addressed the jury, first on the legal points of the case. Mr. Chilcott had contended that the company must either deliver the goods personally, or send notice to the consignees of the arrival of the ship. But almost all the cases he had cited were applicable to land carriers, not to carriage by sea. In the latter case, no notice of arrival was necessary; the consignee was to look out for the arrival of the vessel, and the law provided that he should have reasonable time and opportunity for taking away the goods. Mr. Stokes also sought to put in the "shipping note" as evidence, but this was objected to by Mr. Chilcott, and after some discussion the Vice-Warden decided that it was inadmissible, being only a contract between the wharfinger in London and the shippers. Witnesses called were:

Mr. Thomas Hitchins, the agent of the Truro Shipping Company, was then called and examined at considerable length. JAMES ANTHONY, one of the licensed town porters said he and Osborne took two boxes of tea to Mr. Tannahill's the first day; the addresses on them were in full. Mr. PAUL QUICK had been a shipowner and shipmaster at the port of Truro since 1808. Mr. RICHARD ANDREWS was shareholder in the shipping company; also a porter merchant and maltster, and a considerable importer; had been an importer about twenty-five years. Mr. SYLVNUS JAMES had been a merchant at Truro thirty-eight years. Was not a member of the Truro Shipping Company, or in any way interested. Had imported much by the company's vessels, especially of late years.

The evidence concluded, Mr. Hockin summed up the case for defendants. He said, in the absence of any written agreement or verbal arrangement between the parties, the matter must stand on the usages of the trade of the port; according to which, defendants' contract only extended to the bringing of the goods to Truro; and the plaintiff's business was either to take them from the ship's side, or from the town quay, by his own servants, or by his own agents the town porters. Mr. Hitchins's duty was discharged, the moment the goods were fairly placed before the porters, and before the servants of the owners. By whose negligence or default was it that Mr. Tannahill's goods were not properly selected? It was the default of his agent in London, the Consignor, who had not properly addressed them, and it was he who should be made liable, and not the Shipping Company. On this ground he contended that the negligence was not on the part of the company; and also on another ground, Mr. Tannahill's own neglect to look after his property; his failing to make inquiry of Mr. Hitchins for more than two months, according to Hitchins's account; and his not bringing the matter before the committee of the company for five months. He submitted that the neglect was not with the defendants, and that the verdict ought to be in their favour.

Mr. Chilcott replied on the whole case. He contended that the manifest itself constituted a contract on the part of the company not only to bring the goods to Truro, but to deliver them to plaintiff. The witnesses for defendants had shown that when goods were left, notices were sent to the owners. He remarked upon the evidence, and pointing out the discrepancies between Mr. Hitchins's evidence and the plaintiff's, and one or two of plaintiff's witnesses, he submitted that the evidence for plaintiff was the more entitled to credit. Plaintiff had not been guilty of negligence; the reason he waited five weeks before he made inquiry, was because he expected the missing goods would come by another vessel. Nor was there negligence on the part of the Consignor. Even if Mr. Hitchins were correct and twenty-two packages were marked by initials, the manifest would show him how many belonged to each owner. The company had not complied with what they now set up as the usage; for in different cases they gave notice to the owners of the arrival of goods. And if, indeed, it could be shown they had been negligent, their usages would go for nothing in law. Another aspect of the case was, that there was nothing to show clearly that the whole of plaintiff's goods had been brought to the town quay; the missing boxes might have been lost at Malpas, or somewhere down the river where part of the cargo was discharged. (Mr. Chilcott was here reminded that Mr. Hitchins's evidence was that he had seen the whole on the quay which were in the manifest; and the Vice-Warden said it was remarkable that Mr. Joseph Thomas had not been called so say something about the matter.) Mr. Chilcott said Mr. Hitchins might have been mistaken, as he had evidently been in some other matters. He contended that the negligence was clearly on the part of the company, through their agent; and that the plaintiff was entitled to a fair compensation for his loss.

The jury retired from the court, and in eight minutes returned, and gave a verdict for the plaintiff for GBP56. 16s. 2d. The trial excited great interest, and the court was much crowded.

HILL v. ROUSE - Tavistock United Mines. This was a case in equity, Mr. CHILCOTT for the plaintiff, and Mr. STOKES for the defendant. It was an action by a carrier, who claimed five guineas from the mine, partly the balance of a contract for carrying stones for an engine-house, and partly for day work. The account had been going on a long time. Plaintiff stated that GBP2. 11s. was due to him upon the contract work; but the purser swore that he had left the money for the plaintiff with Captain Rouse and the captain stated that he had paid the plaintiff. As to the day-work, there was a dispute whether plaintiff's horses had been employed a half or a whole day; and there was another question of GBP2 for day-work in June last. Plaintiff said it was for carrying tin-stuff, and he had no means of knowing the number of tons he carried, but was obliged to depend for that on the agents of the mine. They told him GBP1. 4s. was due to him, which he understood was for the month of May, and that he ought to be paid also for June. The agents produced their book, and said GBP1. 4s. was owing for both May and June, and they had made it up to June, contrary to their usual practice, because he then left off working for the mine. The Vice-Warden said, as to the GBP1. 4s. plaintiff had acknowledged that he must leave the amount to the agents; and on the balance for contract work the evidence was so contradictory that he should not make a decree; the claim was therefore dismissed.

PLYMOUTH - It will be seen by advertisement that the fine ship, "Roslin Castle," is appointed to sail for Quebec in April. The arrangements made last year for her spring voyage gave great satisfaction, and she is still in the agency of the same gentleman, Mr. JOSEPH SCALES[?]

CORONERS' INQUESTS - The following inquests have been held by Mr. JOHN CARLYON, county coroner:- On Saturday last, at Goonearl, in the parish of St. Agnes, on the body of JANE TRUAN, widow, aged 56 years, who went to milk her cow in a cow-shed at the end of her house, on Thursday evening; and, being a great deal longer than usual, a person called DIANNA MERRIN, who resided under the same roof with her, lit a candle and went out to see if anything had happened, and she found her lying in an insensible state, near the cow. She immediately gave an alarm, and the deceased was carried into her house; but she never rallied, and died shortly afterwards. There were no marks of violence on the body; and it did not appear that she had been struck by the cow. Mr. MOYLE, surgeon, was op opinion that she died of ser[i]ous apoplexy, and the jury returned a verdict to that effect.

On the same day, at the Exeter Inn, Richmond-hill, Truro, on the body of JAMES PENNELL, a little boy, aged seven years, who was drowned by falling into a well, in a field at the top of Richmond-hill, adjoining the works of the Cornwall Railway. From the evidence of a little boy called WILLIAM THOMAS, aged nine years, it appeared that on Saturday afternoon the deceased and himself were in a field hoisting a kite. Witness thought the tail of the kite was not heavy enough, and the deceased volunteered to get a stick to tie on to it; and he went to the hedge near the well to get one. Witness, seeing where he was going, cautioned him to take care and not fall into the well; but presently afterwards he fell in, and witness heard him calling for some one to take him out. Witness then ran to his mother's house, near by, and told her what had happened, and she and another woman proceeded to the spot, and were met by a person called JOHN THOMAS JOHNS, who on hearing what had happened, dropped a wheelbarrow which he had with him, and went into the field. On examining the mouth of the well, he found it was only covered over with some loose thorns; which made it more dangerous than if it had been perfectly open. On looking down he saw something like a cap floating on the water. Finding that he could not do anything without getting a grapnel, he ran and got one from Mr. JOSIAH RANDLE, and returned to the well with it. As soon as he had fastened a rope to it, Mr. Randle himself arrived, and after a short time drew the body up by hitching the grapnel in part of the clothes. By this time the poor little boy had been in the water at least twenty minutes, and life was extinct. The well was twenty-three or twenty-four feet deep; and in winter it was full of water, but in summer about four or five feet deep. The field in which it was sunk was some years ago let out as an allotment field, and at that time the well was securely covered over, and the parties having allotments used the water for watering their crops. Subsequently to that time he field was purchased by the Railway Company, and after it came into their hands, the well being no longer used, the public had stripped off all the collaring and wood-work about it, and it had remained open and unprotected for the last three or four years. The jury returned a verdict of "accidental death," and requested that the coroner would see the railway authorities and make them acquainted with the dangerous state of the well, and inform them that it was the jury's opinion that means should be adopted to prevent the recurrence of any similar accident. We understand that the coroner has acted on the suggestion of the jury, and has received a promise from Mr. WHITLEY, the company's surveyor, that proper means of guarding the mouth of the well shall be immediately adopted.

On the 16th inst., in the parish of Crowan, on the body of JOHN JEWELL, aged 28 years. The deceased was a miner, and worked at the 70-fathoms level in West Wheal Frances mine, in the parish of Illogan. He was there on Friday morning last, with his comrades, WILLIAM JEWELL and JOHN ABRAHAM, and having charged a hole for blasting and set fire to it, they left the spot and went up about eight fathoms to await the result. In about an hour after they agreed to return to the level for the purpose of ascertaining what effect the charge had had, and the deceased having volunteered, was let down by his comrades by means of a rope. He very soon called to them to wind up, which they did at once, but after winding up three or four fathoms, they found that they had lost the weight from the rope, and concluded therefore that the deceased had fallen away. Jewell without any hesitation determined on going down after him, and was let down in the same manner by the other man Abraham; taking the precaution, however, of tying himself fast to the rope. On reaching the bottom he succeeded in getting hold of the deceased, and called to Abraham to wind up, which he at once proceeded to do. Jewell soon became insensible and lost his hold of the deceased, and remained unconscious for some minutes after he had been hauled up. Several hours afterwards, when the smoke had escaped, a labourer went down and sent up the body of the deceased. Verdict, "accidentally suffocated."

On the following day, in the parish of St. Just in Penwith, on the bodies of MICHAEL DAVEY, aged 37 years, and JOHN SEMMENS aged 41 years, who were drowned at Boscean Mine in that parish on the 11th instant. A great sensation had been produced in the neighbourhood by the circulation of a rumour that there had been some neglect as well as coercion on the part of the agents of the mine towards the deceased men, who it was said had expressed their fears that the accomplishment of the work would be fatal to them, and upon doing so had been threatened with dismissal in case they refused to carry it out. It appeared that in a part of the mine there was a great accumulation of water which the agents were desirous of letting go for the more effectual working of the mine, and for this purpose they had for many days prior to that on which the fatal occurrence happened, been preparing the ground for the insertion of a pipe or pipes to draw off the water. On the day of the accident these two men were down engaged in the preparation of the ground, accompanied by Captain JAMES TREZISE, one of the principal agents whose object in going there was to inspect the place; and after he had made his inspection he directed them to secure what they had done (intending to leave the introduction of the pipe till they returned to their work on the next occasion.) Captain Trezise then returned from the spot to give the poor men the opportunity of so securing what they had done, when almost instantly the water broke away with great violence, and Capt. Trezise seeing it coming, hastened towards a cross-cut for the preservation of his own life; the water, however overtook him, and it was a miracle that he escaped. It took several days to clear away the rubbish and water in the level before the bodies could be got at, but on the 16th they were found one lying on the other. Capt. Trezise deposed to the course they pursued to let go the water, and that it was invariably practised in mines, and though there could not but be danger in doing so, yet they did not anticipate more than usual danger; and that on asking Davey on the preceding Monday, whether he anticipated any danger, and whether he was afraid, he said "No," and "he thought he should be able to do it with safety." Capt. Trezise said that every attention was paid to the security of the ground to prevent accident, and that both the deceased persons were experienced miners, and well calculated for the work. He denied that any coercion or threat of dismissal had been used towards the deceased man or either of them, and a son of Semmens who worked with his father was down at the time of the occurrence, corroborated Capt. Trezise as to that part of the statement. The Jury (which was a very intelligent one) being thoroughly satisfied that the misfortune was the result of accident, returned a verdict of "accidental death."


27 FEBRUARY 1857, Friday


EXETER DISTRICT COURT OF BANKRUPTCY - Thursday, February 19. - Re:- THOMAS HENRY TRIPNEY, woollen draper and grocer, of Perranporth, Cornwall. This was a meeting for last examination. Mr. STOGDON appeared for the bankrupt; Mr. PITTS for the creditors; and Mr. FORD for the petitioning creditors. The balance sheet commenced on the 1st of December, 1854, and concluded at the date of the petition, 7th of February, 1857. On the debtor side are - debts owing, GBP1743. 2s.; profits of business, GBP660. 1s. 10d. Total GBP2403. 3s. 10d. On the creditors side are good debts, GBP577. 1s. 4d.; bad, GBP156. 19s. 6d.; doubtful, GBP297. 11s. 2d. - GBP1031. 12s.; all other property, GBP613. 8s.; bad debts, GBP30; trade expenses, GBP499. 18s. 9d.; household ditto, GBP226. 15s.; difference GBP1. 10s. 1d. Total, GBP2403. 3s. 10d. Among the principal creditors are - JOEL BLAMEY, Penryn, GBP74. 10s. 6d.; WILLIAM BELL, Penryn, GBP94. 17s.; B. W. HICKS, Penryn, GBP54. 2s.; JAMES JENKIN, Redruth, GBP163. 13s. 5d.; SAMUEL MICHELL, Perranporth, GBP49. 17s. 9d.; Miners Bank, Truro, GBP94. 6s. 6d.; and JOHN REED ROWE, Penryn, GBP92. 5s. 7d.

It appears that the bankrupt had previous to his bankruptcy executed a deed of assignment by which all the creditors, except the petitioning creditor, agreed to take 4s. 6d. in the pound. The following creditor, whose debt was GBP56, refused to be a party to the assignment, and a fiat of bankruptcy was the result. A long argument now took place as to the right of the creditors to prove under the bankruptcy. Mr. Pitts contended that they were entitled to retain what they had received and prove for the residue. Mr. Ford on the other hand, contended that there was a marked distinction between a composition received and an assignment for the benefit of the creditors. The latter was a fraud against the third part, who did not consent to it, and that when creditors retained pecuniary benefit under the deed, they were not entitled to prove a release. He referred to cases in Deacon and Chatty's Reports in support of his argument. Mr. Pitts said he had taken counsel's opinion, which was to the effect, "That the payments under the deed cannot be defeated by relation to the execution of the deed as a prior act of bankruptcy; and even if not valid by virtue of its provisions, they may be considered as part payment of just debts made bona fide by the bankrupt, or by his authority. I am inclined to think (continued the learned counsel) that this promise may be retained according to the decision of Lord Eldon in ex parte Vere, 19 Vesey, 93, that the sale of property on fair terms in pursuance of the intended arrangement may be supported, and that the trustees are not bound to pay into court the amount of the purchase money, distributed among the creditors who signed the deed." The Commissioner expressed a hope that Mr. Pitts would not quote counsel's opinions again when a case was before him for judgment. It was not the way to address the court. Mr. Pitts said it had been sent to him. The Commissioner - I shall not pay the least attention to it. Mr. Ford having further addressed the court on the point, the Commissioner referred to the case of exparte Hood, in Deacon and Chitty's Reports, in which Sir G. Rose said, "The deed is in fact nothing more than a collateral security. There are not only no words of actual release contained in it, but there is not even a covenant for release. I therefore think that we cannot prevent any of the creditors, who are parties to it, from proving the balance remaining due to them on their respective debts; that is, to the amount of 15s. in the pound. The case of ex parte Vere is a complete authority, that the creditors are entitled to retain the first payment, and to prove under the commission for the residue of the original debt." He (the Commissioner believed there was no substantial distinction between the case he had cited and the one before him. His decision therefore was that the creditors should prove for the residue of the money due to them.

Mr. Pitts applied to have Mr. Blamey, a large creditor appointed assignee; to which there was no objection, and that gentleman was accordingly appointed. The Commissioner told Mr. Ford that he should have no objection to draw a special case to present to the Lords' Justices. Mr. Ford said he should be obliged to his Honor if he would do so. The Bankrupt was then asked by Mr. Ford as to whom his furniture belonged? He said he had given it up to the trustees, under the deed of assignment; and it had been sold by auction. Mr. Ford - What is the amount of your book debts? Bankrupt - I think between GBP500 and GBP600. Mr. Pitts said the book debts amounted to GBP570. Mr. Ford again put it to his Honor as to what the creditors would be entitled to under the decision he had just given. The Commissioner said they would prove for the whole amount of their debts, minus the 4s. 6d. in the pound. He added that he did not think this administration equity between the parties, but is was the law. Mr. Pitts referred to the proceedings of the petitioning creditor, who he said had offered to compromise his debt if the bankrupt would pay GBP45 and costs. The bankrupt was then allowed to pass his last examination. (Definitely gives Chatty and Chitty spellings!)

ECCLESIASTICAL - The Rev. JOHN MURRAY has been appointed to the perpetual curacy of Marazion. The Rev. JOHN MOYSEY BARTLETT has been appointed to the vicarage of St. Hilary; and the Rev. J. H. TUCKER to the vicarage of Childs Wickenham, Gloucestershire.

APPOINTMENTS - Lieut. Colonel CORYTON has received his commission appointing him Lieutenant-Colonel Commandant of the 1st Rifles Regiment, in the place of HUGH HENWOOD, formerly of St. Veep, and for many years past an extensive planter in Grenada, has been appointed member of the executive and legislative councils of that island. Mr. PHILIP GROSE, tide-waiter and boatman at Padstow, has been appointed tide-surveyor, &c., at that port, the office of comptroller having been abolished.

PRESENTATION OF COLONEL SCOBELL'S PORTRAIT - On Thursday the 19th instant, the Guardians of the Penzance Union presented to the parishes of that union a portrait of their chairman, Colonel Scobell. Some other kind of testimonial had been contemplated, but the wishes of Colonel Scobell on the subject having been ascertained, it was resolved to have a portrait of him painted by Mr. PENTREATH, and hung in the Board-room. Colonel Scobell, as a magistrate, an agriculturist, and a poor law guardian has devoted his time and talents to his duties for half a century in this neighbourhood; and a very cordial feeling was manifested in favour of the testimonial as soon as it was proposed to be given. Thursday the 19th instant, was fixed on for the inauguration, and the guardians from the various parishes, together with some other friends of Colonel Scobell, assembled in the Board-room. Mr. R. PEARCE commenced the proceedings, and in an appropriate address, stated that they had all long entertained a high opinion of the extraordinary and excellent services rendered to the district at large, and especially to its poorer classes, by their esteemed friend, Colonel Scobell. They were guardians selected to represent the interests of nineteen parishes, and were met, not to present their chairman's portrait to themselves, or to future guardians, but to the public at large, in the expectation and hope that it might be a lasting record of his services and their gratitude, and a stimulus to succeeding chairmen. (Cheers) The portrait was to be presented to upwards of 50,000 people, the population of that union, over whom, in his capacity as Chairman of the Board of Guardians, their friend had presided for the last twenty years. The portrait was then uncovered, it being an admirable likeness, life-size and half length, representing Colonel Scobell sitting in the carved oak chair of the Board-room, the poor-law book on the desk before him, and a pen in his hand. The frame is massive, in the antique style, and from the bottom of it Mr. Pearce read the following inscription:- "John Scobell, of Nancealverne, Esquire, Chairman of the Penzance Union, a tribute of respect from the Guardians over whom he has presided since the formation of the Union in 1837, a period of twenty years." The picture was much admired, and Mr. T. S. BOLITHO, amongst other remarks, stated that they had offered their worthy chairman this tribute of respect, not only on account of his presidency in that room, but for the respect and regard they had for him in his individual and private character. (Cheers) Colonel Scobell returned thanks with much emotion, and said he felt deep gratitude for the kindness they had shown, not only to himself, but to his family, on this occasion. He had found the greatest pleasure in attending that board, and meeting his brother farmers and other gentlemen on public business. He had been carrying on the little social duties connected with society in that neighbourhood for more than half a century; he had worked hard at the new poor laws, and, seeing their great advantage as compared with the old, he felt flattered at being connected in any way with them. In the days when parish vestries were in action, there were great inconveniences and difficulties attendant on the carrying out of the poor law at all. If he lived out this month, he should commence his seventy-eighth year, and he could look back and say, that there was a great change and improvement in that neighbourhood and in society in many ways, as compared with former times. After speaking further on this topic, he thanked Mr. Pentreath for having produced so excellent a portrait of him, and again expressed his deep gratitude to the guardians for their kind feeling towards him. (Cheers) Mr. S. BORLASE said he could bear testimony to the kindness for a period of thirty years of his near neighbour Co. Scobell, to his invaluable private friendship and public benefactions. Not a farmer in the neighbourhood but had enjoyed his example and been offered the fruits of his experience; he had brought down improved agricultural implements long ago; and for these services as well as for the immense trouble he had taken in looking after this Union from the first, and the great perseverance with which he had discharged his duties in every respect, the present proceedings were but a trivial acknowledgement. (Cheers) We should add that in connection with these proceedings, 139 inmates of the union-house were feasted with beef and plum pudding; and at half-past two a dinner took place at the Union Hotel, at which twenty-five guardians and others attended, and the chair was taken by Mr. R. Pearce, with Colonel Scobell on his right, and Mr. H. PASCOE, of Treganhoe, on his left. Mr. BALL supplied an excellent dinner, and a variety of toasts were drunk afterwards, and suitably responded to, and the afternoon was spent in the most agreeable manner.

RECEIVER OF WRECK - The Lords of the Committee of Privy Council for Trade have, with the sanction of the Honourable the Commissioners of Customs, appointed Mr. RICHARD HOLDEN, principal coast officer of Charlestown, to be deputy receiver of Droits of Admiralty for the district extending from the Black Head to Polkerris.

CAMBORNE PETTY SESSIONS - On Tuesday last a lad about thirteen years of age, named EDWIN GLANVILL, of Camborne, was summoned before the bench for stealing 2lbs. of candles from North Roskear mine, the property of PHILIP MARTIN and others. The case was proved, and he was committed to Bodmin gaol for two months, and to be once privately whipped.

COLT SHOEING - Mr. JEWELL, of Tuckingmill, near Camborne, who has lately returned from Australia, purchased a fine colt, three years old, from Tehidy park, and on Friday last took it to a smithy at Tuckingmill to be shod. Two smiths attempted to do so four times, but could not succeed, and they then proposed to throw the colt, which is a remarkably handsome one, but to that Mr. Jewell would not consent; and on Saturday he took the colt to Mr. THOMAS HOLMAN's shop, at Camborne, without mentioning to him the occurrence on Friday at Tuckingmill. Mr. Holman suited the shoes and put all right in fifteen minutes, with apparently the greatest ease and comfort. Our correspondent adds that Mr. Jewell, who is considered a competent judge, says he never saw a more complete master of this work than Mr. Holman.

TRURO POLICE - On Saturday last, before Mr. NANKIVELL, magistrate, JAMES BROWN, a travelling vagrant, of Cumberland, was convicted of begging in the streets, shops, &c. Being an old offender, he was committed to the house of correction for twenty-one days.

On Monday, before the Mayor, Captain KEMPE, Mr. CHAPPEL, and Mr. PADDON, magistrates, WILLIAM SANDO was charged with fighting in Lemon-street on Saturday night at ten o'clock, to the annoyance of the inhabitants. He was fined 5s. and expenses.

On Wednesday, before the Mayor, Mr. PADDON and Mr. CHAPPEL, magistrates, SAMUEL THOMAS was charged with being drunk and breaking open the street door of the house of Mr. W. H. TUCKER, blacksmith, Calenick-street. It appeared that about twelve o'clock on Tuesday night, Thomas and another man were in a small court leading back from Calenick-street, and Thomas was kicking at the doors, and he kicked in a panel of Tucker's door. Tucker jumped out of bed and ran down stairs in his shirt to see what damage was done, upon which Thomas seized him by his hair and pulled out a quantity. They then closed with each other, and fell down, and Tucker's shirt was destroyed. The neighbours came and called for the police, and police-constable GAY came up and took Thomas into custody. Tucker did not press the charge for wilful damage; but Thomas was ordered to pay for the panel of the door and the shirt, amounting to 6s., and was fined 5s. and costs on the policeman's charge for being drunk.

UNLAWFUL DETENTION OF PROPERTY - On Monday last, at Penzance, before the Mayor (Mr. COULSON,) Mr. BOASE, Mr. BORLASE, and Mr. BATTEN, magistrates, RICHARD GRENFELL of St. Just, carrier, was charged with stealing three ten pound notes and other property, belonging to WILLIAM CARNE CORIN, of Gulval, farmer. It appeared that on Thursday, Mr. Corin came to market and about one o'clock sold a horse for GBP31, payment for which was made by three GBP10 notes on the Hereford, Ross, and Archenfield bank, and a sovereign in gold. This money was deposited in a chamois leather bag, in which two sovereigns and a half in gold, some loose silver, and a massive ring of Australia gold (with "W. C. Corin" plainly engraved on it) had been previously placed. Mr. Corin went to the Mount's Bay and Penzance Banks, but they declined cashing the notes. Having potatoes in the potatoe market he went there about four o'clock, and after a short time entered an adjoining beer-shop with WILLIAM ROWE, of Hea Moor. They drank a pint of beer in a room in which several carriers were sitting, and called for a second ping. On the point of paying for his beer Mr. Corin put his hand into his left hand trousers pocket and found his money gone. He at once described the property he had lost and informed all present of it. Having made a slight search he proceeded to Mr. CARNE's bank, but found he had not lost it there. He then informed the police and the town crier of the loss, and the latter "cried" a reward of GBP5. A person who sat at his right hand in the beer-shop left the room before he discovered his loss, but he could not say who that man was. The loss of his property occasioned a good deal of talk in the town, but nothing was heard of the matter until Saturday, when a little girl came to Messrs. BOLITHOS' bank to change a GBP10 note. Mr. COURTENAY immediately saw it was a Hereford note, and informed the police of the circumstance. Mr. Courtenay and Inspector OLDS having ascertained where the girl came from, proceeded to Mrs. WHITE's, milliner, Market Jew-street, and found that a Mrs. Grenfell, of St. Just, had made a slight purchase there and had tendered a GBP10 note on the Hereford bank. She had two other notes in her possession, and Inspector Olds accompanied her to her house at ~St. Just, and she handed him the missing bag, three sovereigns and half sovereign in gold, six shillings and sixpence in silver, and the ring. The third note had been received from Mr. Courtenay. On their return to Penzance, Inspector Olds told Grenfell what he had received from his wife, and he remarked that he had given the purse and contents to her, and that he had found them on Thursday under a table at Mr. PADDY's beer-shop. Evidence was given before the magistrates which they considered justified them in committing Grenfell for trial at the next quarter sessions. He was admitted to bail.

CHARGE OF CUTTING AND WOUNDING - On Monday last, before the magistrates at Truro, MARY ANN DREW, of Probus, was charged with stabbing and wounding JOHN CAVILL and CATHERINE COCK. It appeared that Cavill and the woman Drew had lived together for some time in Kenwyn-street; but on account of her violent and passionate temper, they at length separated. On Sunday evening last, Cavill was in Catherine Cock's house on Chappel-hill, adjoining the house where Mary Ann Drew was then living. Cavill was sitting before the fire, when suddenly Drew came in, and without saying a word, stabbed him under the eye with a pair of scissors, inflicting a deep wound, which bled profusely. Catherine Cock got up and endeavoured to prevent Drew from repeating the blow, upon which the latter stabbed Cock with the scissors on the top of her forehead. A man called MENHENNET, who lived in the house, was upstairs, and hearing a disturbance below, and an outcry from Cock, he ran down, and seized Drew, who resisted violently, and got out of the house before he could take the scissors from her. In a few minutes, police constable GAY arrived, and drew was taken into custody. She was committed to the assizes for stabbing and wounding Cavill and Cock, with intent to do them grievous bodily harm.

ACCIDENTS - At Callington, on the 18th inst., a little boy about three years old, son of J. FOX, miner, whilst playing in front of the fire place, accidentally touched the teakettle which was boiling on the fire, and the contents were spilled over the lower parts of the child's body. The child is much burnt, and its recovery appears to be doubtful.

At Gonamena Mine on the 20th inst., as THOMAS FLOWERS, one of the enginemen was doing something to the engine, a handle belonging to another part of the engine struck him behind the ear and squeezed it off, with the exception of a narrow piece of skin. The surgeon of the mine was soon in attendance, and stitched it up, but a very fain hope of saving it.

As Mr. MUDGE, tanner, of Bodmin, was returning from his usual ride on the evening of Wednesday the 18th instant, the horse, from some unknown cause, took fright near the railway terminus, and dashing against the corner of the Railway Inn, the unfortunate gentleman was thrown out with great violence, his thigh broken in two or three places, and he was otherwise considerably injured. On Monday he was still in rather a precarious state, though it is hoped that under the skilful treatment of Mr. J. MUDGE, surgeon, his son, he will soon begin to amend.

On the 20th instant, as Mr. WILLIAM EVA was with a carriage and pair at the Basset Arms, one mile from Falmouth, just as he was going to mount, the horses started off, and first came in contact with the turnpike gate, when the carriage which was a valuable one was knocked off. The horses continued for some time till they got near Boyers Cellars, when one of them got his leg broken, and was obliged to be killed. Mr. Eva escaped with some severe bruises.

HUNTING - We are authorised to state that Mr. GEORGE WILLIAMS, of Trevince, has no connexion whatever with what are called the Porkellis Hounds, and we are strongly inclined to believe that the proper description of these dogs should be harriers. The right to hunt the Porkellis country has been granted by the landowners to Mr. WILLIAM WILLIAMS, as the Master, and for the Members of the F.B.H., who will take the country as they have hitherto done. Any other persons, therefore, hunting with fox hounds in that district, must be considered as trespassers.



[  BACK  ]